REVIEW 2 cited by
Neural Algorithmic Reasoning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Algorithms have been fundamental to recent global technological advances and, in particular, they have been the cornerstone of technical advances in one field rapidly being applied to another. We argue that algorithms possess fundamentally different qualities to deep learning methods, and this strongly suggests that, were deep learning methods better able to mimic algorithms, generalisation of the sort seen with algorithms would become possible with deep learning -- something far out of the reach of current machine learning methods. Furthermore, by representing elements in a continuous space of learnt algorithms, neural networks are able to adapt known algorithms more closely to real-world problems, potentially finding more efficient and pragmatic solutions than those proposed by human computer scientists. Here we present neural algorithmic reasoning -- the art of building neural networks that are able to execute algorithmic computation -- and provide our opinion on its transformative potential for running classical algorithms on inputs previously considered inaccessible to them.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Long-Short Alignment for Effective Long-Context Modeling in LLMs
A long-short misalignment metric quantifies output distribution drift across context lengths, correlates with long-context performance, and a regularizer based on it improves fine-tuned LLMs.
-
NAROCE: A Neural Algorithmic Reasoner Framework for Online Complex Event Detection
A two-stage framework learns complex event rules from LLM-generated pseudo traces and then maps sensor embeddings into that rule space, matching a stronger baseline with half the labels on a synthetic benchmark.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.