Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Advances in adversarial attacks and defenses in computer vision: A survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2108.00401 v2 pith:SOFCWOEO submitted 2021-08-01 cs.CV cs.CRcs.CYcs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.CRcs.CYcs.LG
keywords visioncomputeradversarialattackscontributionsdeeplearningliterature
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep Learning (DL) is the most widely used tool in the contemporary field of computer vision. Its ability to accurately solve complex problems is employed in vision research to learn deep neural models for a variety of tasks, including security critical applications. However, it is now known that DL is vulnerable to adversarial attacks that can manipulate its predictions by introducing visually imperceptible perturbations in images and videos. Since the discovery of this phenomenon in 2013~[1], it has attracted significant attention of researchers from multiple sub-fields of machine intelligence. In [2], we reviewed the contributions made by the computer vision community in adversarial attacks on deep learning (and their defenses) until the advent of year 2018. Many of those contributions have inspired new directions in this area, which has matured significantly since witnessing the first generation methods. Hence, as a legacy sequel of [2], this literature review focuses on the advances in this area since 2018. To ensure authenticity, we mainly consider peer-reviewed contributions published in the prestigious sources of computer vision and machine learning research. Besides a comprehensive literature review, the article also provides concise definitions of technical terminologies for non-experts in this domain. Finally, this article discusses challenges and future outlook of this direction based on the literature reviewed herein and [2].

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Sequential Difference Maximization: Generating Adversarial Examples via Multi-Stage Optimization

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SDM is a staged iterative attack whose DPDR loss sequentially raises the maximum non-true class probability, beating PGD, APGD, C&W, and AutoAttack on CIFAR-10/100 WideResNet defenses.

  2. The Relationship Between Network Similarity and Transferability of Adversarial Attacks

    cs.CR 2025-01 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Similarity between CNN architectures does not robustly predict transferred adversarial attack success, and the reported high-accuracy decision-tree predictor likely relies on a data-splitting artifact.

Pith tools