Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Coalesced Multi-Output Tsetlin Machines with Clause Sharing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2108.07594 v1 pith:G2CK4DPH submitted 2021-08-17 cs.AI cs.LG

Coalesced Multi-Output Tsetlin Machines with Clause Sharing

classification cs.AI cs.LG
keywords clauseclausescotmaccuracyoutputmultipletsetlinclass
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Using finite-state machines to learn patterns, Tsetlin machines (TMs) have obtained competitive accuracy and learning speed across several benchmarks, with frugal memory- and energy footprint. A TM represents patterns as conjunctive clauses in propositional logic (AND-rules), each clause voting for or against a particular output. While efficient for single-output problems, one needs a separate TM per output for multi-output problems. Employing multiple TMs hinders pattern reuse because each TM then operates in a silo. In this paper, we introduce clause sharing, merging multiple TMs into a single one. Each clause is related to each output by using a weight. A positive weight makes the clause vote for output $1$, while a negative weight makes the clause vote for output $0$. The clauses thus coalesce to produce multiple outputs. The resulting coalesced Tsetlin Machine (CoTM) simultaneously learns both the weights and the composition of each clause by employing interacting Stochastic Searching on the Line (SSL) and Tsetlin Automata (TA) teams. Our empirical results on MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, and Kuzushiji-MNIST show that CoTM obtains significantly higher accuracy than TM on $50$- to $1$K-clause configurations, indicating an ability to repurpose clauses. E.g., accuracy goes from $71.99$% to $89.66$% on Fashion-MNIST when employing $50$ clauses per class (22 Kb memory). While TM and CoTM accuracy is similar when using more than $1$K clauses per class, CoTM reaches peak accuracy $3\times$ faster on MNIST with $8$K clauses. We further investigate robustness towards imbalanced training data. Our evaluations on imbalanced versions of IMDb- and CIFAR10 data show that CoTM is robust towards high degrees of class imbalance. Being able to share clauses, we believe CoTM will enable new TM application domains that involve multiple outputs, such as learning language models and auto-encoding.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Tsetlin Machine Goes Deep: Logical Learning and Reasoning With Graphs

    cs.LG 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    GraphTM uses message passing on graphs to build nested deep clauses, achieving 3.86% higher accuracy than convolutional TM on CIFAR-10 and competitive results on action tracking, recommendations, and genome sequences.

  2. Macroeconomic Message Passing for Anticipating Foreign Exchange Regime Changes: A Deep Logical Learning Approach using Graph Tsetlin Machines

    cs.CE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A Graph Tsetlin Machine with hypervectorized macro multigraphs and message-passing clauses anticipates four USD/JPY regimes, reaching 70.7% overall OOS accuracy and beating reduced-graph and CoTM baselines on stagnant...

  3. FastOmniTMAE: Parallel Clause Learning for Scalable and Hardware-Efficient Tsetlin Embeddings

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    FastOmniTMAE parallelizes clause learning in Tsetlin Machine autoencoders to achieve up to 5x faster training with comparable embedding quality and low-footprint FPGA deployment.