Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Lensing by primordial black holes: constraints from gravitational wave observations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2108.12394 v1 pith:5WNCKOF4 submitted 2021-08-27 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.HEgr-qchep-th

Lensing by primordial black holes: constraints from gravitational wave observations

classification astro-ph.CO astro-ph.HEgr-qchep-th
keywords pbhslesssimmassodotblackconstraintsdarkdetected
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Primordial black holes (PBHs) have been proposed to explain at least a portion of dark matter. Observations have put strong constraints on PBHs in terms of the fraction of dark matter which they can represent, $f_{\rm PBH}$, across a wide mass range -- apart from the stellar-mass range of $20M_\odot\lesssim M_{\rm PBH}\lesssim 100M_\odot$. In this paper, we explore the possibility that such PBHs could serve as point-mass lenses capable of altering the gravitational-wave (GW) signals observed from binary black hole (BBH) mergers along their line-of-sight. We find that careful GW data analysis could verify the existence of such PBHs based on the $fitting~factor$ and odds ratio analyses. When such a lensed GW signal is detected, we expect to be able to measure the redshifted mass of the lens with a relative error $\Delta M_{\rm PBH}/M_{\rm PBH}\lesssim0.3$. If no such lensed GW events were detected despite the operation of sensitive GW detectors accumulating large numbers of BBH mergers, it would translate into a stringent constraint of $f_{\rm PBH}\lesssim 10^{-2}-10^{-5}$ for PBHs with a mass larger than $\sim10M_\odot$ by the Einstein Telescope after one year of running, and $f_{\rm PBH}\lesssim 0.2$ for PBHs with mass greater than $\sim 50M_\odot$ for advanced LIGO after ten years of running.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Identifying lensed gravitational waves with physics-informed posterior learning

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Fusing a simulation-trained common-source mass posterior with waveform features raises lensed-event detection efficiency from 20.8% to 35.2% at 1% false-positive rate and lowers the SNR for 50% efficiency from 45.3 to 33.5.

  2. Parameter inference of millilensed gravitational waves using neural spline flows

    gr-qc 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    Neural spline flows perform fast posterior inference on 11-dimensional millilensed GW parameters with accuracy comparable to dynesty for most quantities and a 3-day to 0.8-second speedup.