Pith. Sign in

RECORD

The K2-OjOS Project: New and revisited planets and candidates in K2 campaigns 5, 16, & 18

Earth and Planetary Astrophysics · Submitted 7 Sep 2021

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim As a result, we report four new planets (K2-355 b, K2-356 b, K2-357 b, and K2-358 b) and 14 planet candidates.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2109.03346 (version 2)
Pith IDWPHRRSYA, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationA. Castro-Gonz\'alez, A. Coya Lozano, C. Gonz\'alez Guti\'errez, C. Rodr\'iguez Pereira, D. V\'azquez Garc\'ia, E. D\'iez Alonso, F. Garc\'ia de la Cuesta, F. Garc\'ia Riesgo, F. Izquierdo-Ruiz, F. J. de Cos Juez, F. S\'anchez Lasheras, J. D. Santos Rodr\'iguez, J. Gonz\'alez-Nuevo, J. Korth, J. Lillo-Box, J. Livingston, J. Men\'endez Blanco, J. M. Recio, J. P. de Leon, J. Polancos Ruiz, J. R. Vidal Blanco, L. Bonavera, M. L. S\'anchez Rodr\'iguez, N. G\'omez Hern\'andez, P. Padilla Tijer\'in, R. Hevia D\'iaz, R. Mu\~niz, R. Pardo Silva, S. Fern\'andez Men\'endez, S. L. Su\'arez G\'omez, S. P\'erez Acevedo. "The K2-OjOS Project: New and revisited planets and candidates in K2 campaigns 5, 16, & 18." arXiv:2109.03346 (2021). https://pith.science/paper/WPHRRSYA
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,117 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.42 · states limitation 0.80 · human participants 0.47 · controlled comparison 0.05 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.84 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We present the first results of K2-OjOS, a collaborative project between professional and amateur astronomers primarily aimed to detect, characterize, and validate new extrasolar planets. For this work, 10 amateur astronomers looked for planetary signals by visually inspecting the 20 427 light curves of K2 campaign 18 (C18). They found 42 planet candidates, of which 18 are new detections and 24 had been detected in the overlapping C5 by previous works. We used archival photometric and spectroscopic observations, as well as new high-spatial resolution images in order to carry out a complete analysis of the candidates found, including a homogeneous characterization of the host stars, transit modelling, search for transit timing variations and statistical validation. As a result, we report four new planets (K2-355 b, K2-356 b, K2-357 b, and K2-358 b) and 14 planet candidates. Besides, we refine the transit ephemeris of the previously published planets and candidates by modelling C5, C16 (when available) and C18 photometric data jointly, largely improving the period and mid-transit time precision. Regarding individual systems, we highlight the new planet K2-356 b and candidate EPIC 211537087.02 being near a 2:1 period commensurability, the detection of significant TTVs in the bright star K2-184 (V = 10.35), the location of K2-103 b inside the habitable zone according to optimistic models, the detection of a new single transit in the known system K2-274, and the disposition reassignment of K2-120 b, which we consider as a planet candidate as the origin of the signal cannot be ascertained.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We present the first results of K2-OjOS, a collaborative project between professional and amateur astronomers primarily aimed to detect, characterize, and validate new extrasolar planets. contribution 0.97 0.63 0.06 asserted 0.99
s1 For this work, 10 amateur astronomers looked for planetary signals by visually inspecting the 20 427 light curves of K2 campaign 18 (C18). method 0.96 0.81 0.02 asserted 1.00
s2 They found 42 planet candidates, of which 18 are new detections and 24 had been detected in the overlapping C5 by previous works. result 0.98 0.93 0.07 asserted 1.00
s3 We used archival photometric and spectroscopic observations, as well as new high-spatial resolution images in order to carry out a complete analysis of the candidates found, including a homogeneous characterization of the host stars, transit modelling, search for transit timing variations and statistical validation. method 1.00 0.94 0.03 asserted 0.98
s4 As a result, we report four new planets (K2-355 b, K2-356 b, K2-357 b, and K2-358 b) and 14 planet candidates. result 0.99 0.96 0.63 asserted 1.00
s5 Besides, we refine the transit ephemeris of the previously published planets and candidates by modelling C5, C16 (when available) and C18 photometric data jointly, largely improving the period and mid-transit time precision. result 0.66 0.96 0.08 asserted 1.00
s6 Regarding individual systems, we highlight the new planet K2-356 b and candidate EPIC 211537087.02 being near a 2:1 period commensurability, the detection of significant TTVs in the bright star K2-184 (V = 10.35), the location of K2-103 b inside the habitable zone according to optimistic models, the detection of a new single transit in the known system K2-274, and the disposition reassignment of K2-120 b, which we consider as a planet candidate as the origin of the signal cannot be ascertained. result 0.91 0.95 0.09 asserted 0.94

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 0.98 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.88.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We present the first results of K2-OjOS, a collaborative project between professional and amateur astronomers primarily aimed to detect, characterize, and validate new extrasolar planets. For this work, 10 amateur astronomers looked for planetary signals by visually inspecting the 20 427 light curves of K2 campaign 18 (C18). They found 42 planet candidates, of which 18 are new detections and 24 had been detected in the overlapping C5 by previous works. We used archival photometric and spectroscopic observations, as well as new high-spatial resolution images in order to carry out a complete analysis of the candidates found, including a homogeneous characterization of the host stars, transit modelling, search for transit timing variations and statistical validation. As a result, we report four new planets (K2-355 b, K2-356 b, K2-357 b, and K2-358 b) and 14 planet candidates. Besides, we refine the transit ephemeris of the previously published planets and candidates by modelling C5, C16 (when available) and C18 photometric data jointly, largely improving the period and mid-transit time precision. Regarding individual systems, we highlight the new planet K2-356 b and candidate EPIC 211537087.02 being near a 2:1 period commensurability, the detection of significant TTVs in the bright star K2-184 (V = 10.35), the location of K2-103 b inside the habitable zone according to optimistic models, the detection of a new single transit in the known system K2-274, and the disposition reassignment of K2-120 b, which we consider as a planet candidate as the origin of the signal cannot be ascertained.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites

Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
Cites as support 1 paper
  • However, we argue that the origin of EPIC 211537087.02 as well as EPIC 211537087.03 must be planetary, given the extremely low probability of finding multiple false positive signals [ref] .

    The Value of Systems with Multiple Transiting Planets · A 2:1 Period commensurability on the new planetary system K2-356 (EPIC 211537087) · 0.98

Cites as background 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.