Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Reframing Instructional Prompts to GPTk's Language

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.07830 v3 pith:4PLCPMMW submitted 2021-09-16 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords instructionspromptsreframedfew-shotinstructionaltasksacrosseffective
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

What kinds of instructional prompts are easier to follow for Language Models (LMs)? We study this question by conducting extensive empirical analysis that shed light on important features of successful instructional prompts. Specifically, we study several classes of reframing techniques for manual reformulation of prompts into more effective ones. Some examples include decomposing a complex task instruction into multiple simpler tasks or itemizing instructions into sequential steps. Our experiments compare the zero-shot and few-shot performance of LMs prompted with reframed instructions on 12 NLP tasks across 6 categories. Compared with original instructions, our reframed instructions lead to significant improvements across LMs with different sizes. For example, the same reframed prompts boost few-shot performance of GPT3-series and GPT2-series by 12.5% and 6.7% respectively averaged over all tasks. Furthermore, reframed instructions reduce the number of examples required to prompt LMs in the few-shot setting. We hope these empirically-driven techniques will pave the way towards more effective future prompting algorithms.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Structured Moral Reasoning in Language Models: A Value-Grounded Evaluation Framework

    cs.HC 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Structured moral prompts, especially first-principles reasoning, improve LLM moral classification accuracy across 12 open models and four benchmarks, and reasoning distillation transfers these gains to a 3B model.

Pith tools