REVIEW 2 cited by
What Would Jiminy Cricket Do? Towards Agents That Behave Morally
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
When making everyday decisions, people are guided by their conscience, an internal sense of right and wrong. By contrast, artificial agents are currently not endowed with a moral sense. As a consequence, they may learn to behave immorally when trained on environments that ignore moral concerns, such as violent video games. With the advent of generally capable agents that pretrain on many environments, it will become necessary to mitigate inherited biases from environments that teach immoral behavior. To facilitate the development of agents that avoid causing wanton harm, we introduce Jiminy Cricket, an environment suite of 25 text-based adventure games with thousands of diverse, morally salient scenarios. By annotating every possible game state, the Jiminy Cricket environments robustly evaluate whether agents can act morally while maximizing reward. Using models with commonsense moral knowledge, we create an elementary artificial conscience that assesses and guides agents. In extensive experiments, we find that the artificial conscience approach can steer agents towards moral behavior without sacrificing performance.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
The Odyssey of the Fittest: Can Agents Survive and Still Be Good?
In an LLM-generated text survival game, a GPT-4o agent was reported to survive better and score more ethically than NEAT and SVI Bayesian agents, but the evaluation is circular because GPT-4o labels its own behavior.
- Utility Engineering: Analyzing and Controlling Emergent Value Systems in AIs
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.