REVIEW 2 cited by
Bound on Quantum Fluctuations in Gravitational Waves from LIGO-Virgo
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We derive some of the central equations governing quantum fluctuations in gravitational waves, making use of general relativity as a sensible effective quantum theory at large distances. We begin with a review of classical gravitational waves in general relativity, including the energy in each mode. We then form the quantum ground state and coherent state, before then obtaining an explicit class of squeezed states. Since existing gravitational wave detections arise from merging black holes, and since the quantum nature of black holes remains puzzling, one can be open-minded to the possibility that the wave is in an interesting quantum mechanical state, such as a highly squeezed state. We compute the time and space two-point correlation functions for the quantized metric perturbations. We then constrain its amplitude with LIGO-Virgo observations. Using existing LIGO-Virgo data, we place a bound on the (exponential) squeezing parameter of the quantum gravitational wave state of $\zeta < 41$.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Suppressed Quantum Effects of Weakly Coupled Waves
Nonclassical (quantum) signatures of weakly coupled waves are suppressed by an extra power of the tiny conversion efficiency η (~10^-21 for axions, ~10^-33 for gravitons), so experiments cannot establish the quantizat...
-
The Challenge of Detecting Quantum Nature of Gravitational Waves
Squeezing of gravitational waves at the source is not an observable resource after projection onto a detector mode; squeezing the detector can in principle witness quantum gravity, but the tiny coupling makes the sign...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.