Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Poisoning Attacks and Defenses on Artificial Intelligence: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.10276 v2 pith:6Z4RUD25 submitted 2022-02-21 cs.CR cs.AI

Poisoning Attacks and Defenses on Artificial Intelligence: A Survey

classification cs.CR cs.AI
keywords attacksdatamainmodelmodelspoisoningresearchseveral
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Machine learning models have been widely adopted in several fields. However, most recent studies have shown several vulnerabilities from attacks with a potential to jeopardize the integrity of the model, presenting a new window of research opportunity in terms of cyber-security. This survey is conducted with a main intention of highlighting the most relevant information related to security vulnerabilities in the context of machine learning (ML) classifiers; more specifically, directed towards training procedures against data poisoning attacks, representing a type of attack that consists of tampering the data samples fed to the model during the training phase, leading to a degradation in the models accuracy during the inference phase. This work compiles the most relevant insights and findings found in the latest existing literatures addressing this type of attacks. Moreover, this paper also covers several defense techniques that promise feasible detection and mitigation mechanisms, capable of conferring a certain level of robustness to a target model against an attacker. A thorough assessment is performed on the reviewed works, comparing the effects of data poisoning on a wide range of ML models in real-world conditions, performing quantitative and qualitative analyses. This paper analyzes the main characteristics for each approach including performance success metrics, required hyperparameters, and deployment complexity. Moreover, this paper emphasizes the underlying assumptions and limitations considered by both attackers and defenders along with their intrinsic properties such as: availability, reliability, privacy, accountability, interpretability, etc. Finally, this paper concludes by making references of some of main existing research trends that provide pathways towards future research directions in the field of cyber-security.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Deep Privacy Funnel Model: From a Discriminative to a Generative Approach with an Application to Face Recognition

    cs.LG 2024-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Introduces Generative Privacy Funnel (GenPF) and deep variational PF (DVPF) models that extend the privacy funnel to generative settings and provide a controllable privacy-utility trade-off with reduced sensitive attr...

  2. The Role of Rigor in Artificial Intelligence

    cs.AI 2026-05 conditional novelty 5.0

    Modern AI's distinctive trajectory is explained by the primacy of operational rigor over conceptual and epistemic rigor across successive paradigms.