Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Visual Spatial Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.00363 v3 pith:7QAJJB5C submitted 2022-04-30 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CV

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CV
keywords spatialhumanmodelsrelationsdatasetnaturalreasoningvisual
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Spatial relations are a basic part of human cognition. However, they are expressed in natural language in a variety of ways, and previous work has suggested that current vision-and-language models (VLMs) struggle to capture relational information. In this paper, we present Visual Spatial Reasoning (VSR), a dataset containing more than 10k natural text-image pairs with 66 types of spatial relations in English (such as: under, in front of, and facing). While using a seemingly simple annotation format, we show how the dataset includes challenging linguistic phenomena, such as varying reference frames. We demonstrate a large gap between human and model performance: the human ceiling is above 95%, while state-of-the-art models only achieve around 70%. We observe that VLMs' by-relation performances have little correlation with the number of training examples and the tested models are in general incapable of recognising relations concerning the orientations of objects.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. DELTAVID: Enhancing Fine-Grained Spatiotemporal Perception with Cross-Video Differences

    cs.CV 2026-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Rule-reward training on controllable cross-video differences (Grounding + MCQ) improves Video MLLM local spatiotemporal evidence localization and transfers to general video QA benchmarks.

  2. Enhancing Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models via Chain-of-Thought Prompting and Reinforcement Learning

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Scene-graph-based chain-of-thought prompting and GRPO training improve spatial reasoning accuracy in vision-language models, and GRPO degrades less than supervised fine-tuning when question wording is flipped.

Pith tools