REVIEW 2 cited by
Visual Spatial Reasoning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Spatial relations are a basic part of human cognition. However, they are expressed in natural language in a variety of ways, and previous work has suggested that current vision-and-language models (VLMs) struggle to capture relational information. In this paper, we present Visual Spatial Reasoning (VSR), a dataset containing more than 10k natural text-image pairs with 66 types of spatial relations in English (such as: under, in front of, and facing). While using a seemingly simple annotation format, we show how the dataset includes challenging linguistic phenomena, such as varying reference frames. We demonstrate a large gap between human and model performance: the human ceiling is above 95%, while state-of-the-art models only achieve around 70%. We observe that VLMs' by-relation performances have little correlation with the number of training examples and the tested models are in general incapable of recognising relations concerning the orientations of objects.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
DELTAVID: Enhancing Fine-Grained Spatiotemporal Perception with Cross-Video Differences
Rule-reward training on controllable cross-video differences (Grounding + MCQ) improves Video MLLM local spatiotemporal evidence localization and transfers to general video QA benchmarks.
-
Enhancing Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models via Chain-of-Thought Prompting and Reinforcement Learning
Scene-graph-based chain-of-thought prompting and GRPO training improve spatial reasoning accuracy in vision-language models, and GRPO degrades less than supervised fine-tuning when question wording is flipped.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.