Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Enhancing Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models via Chain-of-Thought Prompting and Reinforcement Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2507.13362 v1 pith:SLDHWO3Z submitted 2025-07-06 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CL

Enhancing Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models via Chain-of-Thought Prompting and Reinforcement Learning

classification cs.CV cs.AIcs.CL
keywords reasoningpromptingspatialperformancegrpolearningmodelsreinforcement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

This study investigates the spatial reasoning capabilities of vision-language models (VLMs) through Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting and reinforcement learning. We begin by evaluating the impact of different prompting strategies and find that simple CoT formats, where the model generates a reasoning step before the answer, not only fail to help, but can even harm the model's original performance. In contrast, structured multi-stage prompting based on scene graphs (SceneGraph CoT) significantly improves spatial reasoning accuracy. Furthermore, to improve spatial reasoning ability, we fine-tune models using Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) on the SAT dataset and evaluate their performance on CVBench. Compared to supervised fine-tuning (SFT), GRPO achieves higher accuracy on Pass@1 evaluations and demonstrates superior robustness under out-of-distribution (OOD) conditions. In particular, we find that SFT overfits to surface-level linguistic patterns and may degrade performance when test-time phrasing changes (e.g., from "closer to" to "farther from"). GRPO, on the other hand, generalizes more reliably and maintains stable performance under such shifts. Our findings provide insights into how reinforcement learning and structured prompting improve the spatial reasoning capabilities and generalization behavior of modern VLMs. All code is open source at: https://github.com/Yvonne511/spatial-vlm-investigator

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. SPATIOROUTE: Dynamic Prompt Routing for Zero-Shot Spatial Reasoning

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    SpatioRoute introduces dynamic prompt routing that improves zero-shot spatial VQA accuracy by up to 5% on the SQA3D benchmark across VLMs without 3D inputs or fine-tuning.

  2. Does RLVR Extend Reasoning Boundaries? Investigating Capability Expansion in Vision-Language Models

    cs.AI 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    RLVR on synthetic mazes enables VLMs to solve spatial reasoning tasks unreachable by the base model and generalizes to real-world navigation benchmarks.

  3. Eyes on VLM: Benchmarking Gaze Following and Social Gaze Prediction in Vision Language Models

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    VLMs are evaluated on gaze following and social gaze prediction using existing datasets in zero-shot and fine-tuned settings, revealing they currently lack precise capabilities compared to visual models.

  4. Eyes on VLM: Benchmarking Gaze Following and Social Gaze Prediction in Vision Language Models

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    EyeVLM benchmark finds that current VLMs underperform specialized visual models on gaze following and social gaze prediction, with fine-tuning narrowing but not closing the gap.