Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

ESCHER: Eschewing Importance Sampling in Games by Computing a History Value Function to Estimate Regret

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.04122 v2 pith:66KEWDSD submitted 2022-06-08 cs.GT cs.AIcs.LGstat.ML

ESCHER: Eschewing Importance Sampling in Games by Computing a History Value Function to Estimate Regret

classification cs.GT cs.AIcs.LGstat.ML
keywords escherneuraldreamgamesregretimportancelargemethod
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

Recent techniques for approximating Nash equilibria in very large games leverage neural networks to learn approximately optimal policies (strategies). One promising line of research uses neural networks to approximate counterfactual regret minimization (CFR) or its modern variants. DREAM, the only current CFR-based neural method that is model free and therefore scalable to very large games, trains a neural network on an estimated regret target that can have extremely high variance due to an importance sampling term inherited from Monte Carlo CFR (MCCFR). In this paper we propose an unbiased model-free method that does not require any importance sampling. Our method, ESCHER, is principled and is guaranteed to converge to an approximate Nash equilibrium with high probability. We show that the variance of the estimated regret of ESCHER is orders of magnitude lower than DREAM and other baselines. We then show that ESCHER outperforms the prior state of the art -- DREAM and neural fictitious self play (NFSP) -- on a number of games and the difference becomes dramatic as game size increases. In the very large game of dark chess, ESCHER is able to beat DREAM and NFSP in a head-to-head competition over $90\%$ of the time.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Harder Path: Last Iterate Convergence for Uncoupled Learning in Zero-Sum Games with Bandit Feedback

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    In bandit-feedback zero-sum games, uncoupled algorithms achieve last-iterate Nash convergence at the optimal rate of O(T^{-1/4}).

  2. How Much Due Diligence Before You Bid? Learning in Intractable Takeover Auctions

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Self-play RL in a takeover auction model shows optimal due diligence is modest and finite, decreasing with cost and competition, while simple general methods outperform specialized ones in large intractable games.