REVIEW 8 cited by
Forecasting Future World Events with Neural Networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Forecasting Future World Events with Neural Networks
read the original abstract
Forecasting future world events is a challenging but valuable task. Forecasts of climate, geopolitical conflict, pandemics and economic indicators help shape policy and decision making. In these domains, the judgment of expert humans contributes to the best forecasts. Given advances in language modeling, can these forecasts be automated? To this end, we introduce Autocast, a dataset containing thousands of forecasting questions and an accompanying news corpus. Questions are taken from forecasting tournaments, ensuring high quality, real-world importance, and diversity. The news corpus is organized by date, allowing us to precisely simulate the conditions under which humans made past forecasts (avoiding leakage from the future). Motivated by the difficulty of forecasting numbers across orders of magnitude (e.g. global cases of COVID-19 in 2022), we also curate IntervalQA, a dataset of numerical questions and metrics for calibration. We test language models on our forecasting task and find that performance is far below a human expert baseline. However, performance improves with increased model size and incorporation of relevant information from the news corpus. In sum, Autocast poses a novel challenge for large language models and improved performance could bring large practical benefits.
Forward citations
Cited by 8 Pith papers
-
WorldReasoner: Evaluating Whether Language Model Agents Forecast Events with Valid Reasoning
WorldReasoner supplies 345 resolved forecasting tasks built from 14,141 articles to score LM agents on outcome quality, evidence quality, and reasoning quality against time-bounded evidence and hindsight graphs.
-
Is Capability a Liability? More Capable Language Models Make Worse Forecasts When It Matters Most
More capable LLMs produce worse distributional forecasts on superlinear growth time series with tail risks of regime change, with the error concentrated in the upper tail; this reverses on conventional threshold metrics.
-
Prediction Arena: Benchmarking AI Models on Real-World Prediction Markets
Frontier AI models lose 16-31% trading on Kalshi over 57 days but show better results on Polymarket, with platform design strongly affecting outcomes and prediction accuracy mattering more than research volume.
-
Agentic Forecasting using Sequential Bayesian Updating of Linguistic Beliefs
An agentic forecaster with linguistic belief states, logit-space multi-trial shrinkage, and hierarchical Platt calibration achieves SOTA Brier Index on ForecastBench binary questions.
-
Is Capability a Liability? More Capable Language Models Make Worse Forecasts When It Matters Most
More capable language models exhibit inverse scaling on distributional forecasting for superlinear-growth time series with tail risks, with errors concentrated in the upper tail across synthetic and real datasets.
-
Agentic Forecasting using Sequential Bayesian Updating of Linguistic Beliefs
BLF achieves state-of-the-art binary forecasting on ForecastBench by using linguistic belief states updated in tool-use loops, hierarchical multi-trial logit averaging, and hierarchical Platt scaling calibration.
-
Harnessing Pre-Resolution Signals for Future Prediction Agents
Milkyway evolves a future prediction harness using internal feedback from repeated predictions on the same unresolved question, achieving top scores on FutureX (44.07 to 60.90) and FutureWorld (62.22 to 77.96).
-
Harnessing Pre-Resolution Signals for Future Prediction Agents
Milkyway uses pre-resolution signals from temporal contrasts in evolving evidence and repeated forecasts to evolve a harness and improve predictions before resolution, outperforming baselines on FutureX and FutureWorld.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.