REVIEW 5 cited by
Visual representations in the human brain are aligned with large language models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Visual representations in the human brain are aligned with large language models
read the original abstract
The human brain extracts complex information from visual inputs, including objects, their spatial and semantic interrelations, and their interactions with the environment. However, a quantitative approach for studying this information remains elusive. Here, we test whether the contextual information encoded in large language models (LLMs) is beneficial for modelling the complex visual information extracted by the brain from natural scenes. We show that LLM embeddings of scene captions successfully characterise brain activity evoked by viewing the natural scenes. This mapping captures selectivities of different brain areas, and is sufficiently robust that accurate scene captions can be reconstructed from brain activity. Using carefully controlled model comparisons, we then proceed to show that the accuracy with which LLM representations match brain representations derives from the ability of LLMs to integrate complex information contained in scene captions beyond that conveyed by individual words. Finally, we train deep neural network models to transform image inputs into LLM representations. Remarkably, these networks learn representations that are better aligned with brain representations than a large number of state-of-the-art alternative models, despite being trained on orders-of-magnitude less data. Overall, our results suggest that LLM embeddings of scene captions provide a representational format that accounts for complex information extracted by the brain from visual inputs.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
ErrorRadar: Benchmarking Complex Mathematical Reasoning of Multimodal Large Language Models Via Error Detection
ErrorRadar is a new benchmark of 2,500 multimodal K-12 math problems for MLLM error step identification and categorization, where GPT-4o trails human experts by ~10%.
-
A foundation model of vision, audition, and language for in-silico neuroscience
TRIBE v2 is a multimodal AI model that predicts human brain activity more accurately than linear encoding models and recovers established neuroscientific findings through in-silico testing.
-
NeuroFlow: Toward Unified Visual Encoding and Decoding from Neural Activity
NeuroFlow is the first unified flow model for bidirectional visual encoding and decoding from neural activity using NeuroVAE and cross-modal flow matching.
-
Meta-learning In-Context Enables Training-Free Cross Subject Brain Decoding
A meta-optimized in-context learning approach enables training-free cross-subject semantic visual decoding from fMRI by inferring individual neural encoding patterns via hierarchical inference on a few examples.
-
Task-conditioned probing of instruction-tuned multimodal LLMs: Region-specific brain alignment patterns under naturalistic stimuli
Instruction-tuned multimodal LLMs show higher brain alignment (~9-20% over baselines) under task-specific instructions during naturalistic video stimuli, with task-conditioned subspaces and weak semantic coupling.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.