Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Optimizing Data Collection for Machine Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.01234 v1 pith:TEFTYCTZ submitted 2022-10-03 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CV

Optimizing Data Collection for Machine Learning

classification cs.LG cs.AIcs.CV
keywords datacollectioncostslearningperformancetargetsfailingfuture
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Modern deep learning systems require huge data sets to achieve impressive performance, but there is little guidance on how much or what kind of data to collect. Over-collecting data incurs unnecessary present costs, while under-collecting may incur future costs and delay workflows. We propose a new paradigm for modeling the data collection workflow as a formal optimal data collection problem that allows designers to specify performance targets, collection costs, a time horizon, and penalties for failing to meet the targets. Additionally, this formulation generalizes to tasks requiring multiple data sources, such as labeled and unlabeled data used in semi-supervised learning. To solve our problem, we develop Learn-Optimize-Collect (LOC), which minimizes expected future collection costs. Finally, we numerically compare our framework to the conventional baseline of estimating data requirements by extrapolating from neural scaling laws. We significantly reduce the risks of failing to meet desired performance targets on several classification, segmentation, and detection tasks, while maintaining low total collection costs.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Intrinsic Fingerprint of LLMs: Continue Training is NOT All You Need to Steal A Model!

    cs.CR 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Standard deviation distributions of attention matrices in LLMs remain distinctive and stable after continued training, enabling fingerprinting to trace model lineage and detect potential plagiarism such as in Pangu Pro MoE.