REVIEW 3 cited by
PASTA: Table-Operations Aware Fact Verification via Sentence-Table Cloze Pre-training
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Fact verification has attracted a lot of research attention recently, e.g., in journalism, marketing, and policymaking, as misinformation and disinformation online can sway one's opinion and affect one's actions. While fact-checking is a hard task in general, in many cases, false statements can be easily debunked based on analytics over tables with reliable information. Hence, table-based fact verification has recently emerged as an important and growing research area. Yet, progress has been limited due to the lack of datasets that can be used to pre-train language models (LMs) to be aware of common table operations, such as aggregating a column or comparing tuples. To bridge this gap, in this paper we introduce PASTA, a novel state-of-the-art framework for table-based fact verification via pre-training with synthesized sentence-table cloze questions. In particular, we design six types of common sentence-table cloze tasks, including Filter, Aggregation, Superlative, Comparative, Ordinal, and Unique, based on which we synthesize a large corpus consisting of 1.2 million sentence-table pairs from WikiTables. PASTA uses a recent pre-trained LM, DeBERTaV3, and further pretrains it on our corpus. Our experimental results show that PASTA achieves new state-of-the-art performance on two table-based fact verification benchmarks: TabFact and SEM-TAB-FACTS. In particular, on the complex set of TabFact, which contains multiple operations, PASTA largely outperforms the previous state of the art by 4.7 points (85.6% vs. 80.9%), and the gap between PASTA and human performance on the small TabFact test set is narrowed to just 1.5 points (90.6% vs. 92.1%).
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
TableMind: An Autonomous Programmatic Agent for Tool-Augmented Table Reasoning
TableMind, a two-stage SFT-plus-RL agent trained on an 8B model, reports state-of-the-art results on three table reasoning benchmarks.
-
Unlock the Potential of Large Language Models for Predictive Tabular Tasks in Data Science with Table-Specific Pretraining
Table-specific pretraining of Llama-2 yields significant gains on zero-shot, few-shot, and in-context tabular prediction tasks over prior benchmarks.
-
When TableQA Meets Noise: A Dual Denoising Framework for Complex Questions and Large-scale Tables
EnoTab is a dual denoising framework for TableQA that performs evidence-based question denoising via semantic unit decomposition and evidence tree-guided table pruning with post-order rollback to improve performance o...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.