Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

See, Think, Confirm: Interactive Prompting Between Vision and Language Models for Knowledge-based Visual Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.05226 v1 pith:GO5KYULI submitted 2023-01-12 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
keywords visualreasoningknowledge-basedmodelanswerconfirmipvrlanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large pre-trained vision and language models have demonstrated remarkable capacities for various tasks. However, solving the knowledge-based visual reasoning tasks remains challenging, which requires a model to comprehensively understand image content, connect the external world knowledge, and perform step-by-step reasoning to answer the questions correctly. To this end, we propose a novel framework named Interactive Prompting Visual Reasoner (IPVR) for few-shot knowledge-based visual reasoning. IPVR contains three stages, see, think and confirm. The see stage scans the image and grounds the visual concept candidates with a visual perception model. The think stage adopts a pre-trained large language model (LLM) to attend to the key concepts from candidates adaptively. It then transforms them into text context for prompting with a visual captioning model and adopts the LLM to generate the answer. The confirm stage further uses the LLM to generate the supporting rationale to the answer, verify the generated rationale with a cross-modality classifier and ensure that the rationale can infer the predicted output consistently. We conduct experiments on a range of knowledge-based visual reasoning datasets. We found our IPVR enjoys several benefits, 1). it achieves better performance than the previous few-shot learning baselines; 2). it enjoys the total transparency and trustworthiness of the whole reasoning process by providing rationales for each reasoning step; 3). it is computation-efficient compared with other fine-tuning baselines.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LaRe: Latent Refocusing for Multimodal Reasoning

    cs.CV 2025-11 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    LaRe performs iterative visual refocusing in latent space and reports accuracy gains with fewer tokens, but its main experiments compare against baselines trained with less data.

  2. MagiC: Evaluating Multimodal Cognition Toward Grounded Visual Reasoning

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MagiC evaluates answer correctness, reasoning validity, grounding fidelity, and self-correction on about 900 hand-annotated visual questions across 15 vision-language models.

  3. VFaith: Do Large Multimodal Models Really Reason on Seen Images Rather than Previous Memories?

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new benchmark with edited-image question pairs shows that multimodal reasoning models lose accuracy when visual cues change, suggesting their reasoning is often not faithfully tied to the image.

  4. MIND: Multi-rationale INtegrated Discriminative Reasoning Framework for Multi-modal Large Models

    cs.AI 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    MIND improves multimodal reasoning by training on diverse correct and deliberately wrong rationales with two-stage correction and contrastive alignment, reporting SOTA on ScienceQA, A-OKVQA, and M3CoT.

Pith tools