REVIEW 2 cited by
Differentially Private Natural Language Models: Recent Advances and Future Directions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recent developments in deep learning have led to great success in various natural language processing (NLP) tasks. However, these applications may involve data that contain sensitive information. Therefore, how to achieve good performance while also protecting the privacy of sensitive data is a crucial challenge in NLP. To preserve privacy, Differential Privacy (DP), which can prevent reconstruction attacks and protect against potential side knowledge, is becoming a de facto technique for private data analysis. In recent years, NLP in DP models (DP-NLP) has been studied from different perspectives, which deserves a comprehensive review. In this paper, we provide the first systematic review of recent advances in DP deep learning models in NLP. In particular, we first discuss some differences and additional challenges of DP-NLP compared with the standard DP deep learning. Then, we investigate some existing work on DP-NLP and present its recent developments from three aspects: gradient perturbation based methods, embedding vector perturbation based methods, and ensemble model based methods. We also discuss some challenges and future directions.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
DP-DocLDM: Differentially Private Document Image Generation using Latent Diffusion Models
DP-DocLDM fine-tunes a latent diffusion model under differential privacy to generate synthetic document images, but the public pretraining set already contains the private benchmark datasets, invalidating the claimed ...
-
Attributing Data for Sharpness-Aware Minimization
SAM-HIF and SAM-GIF are proposed as data attribution scores for SAM-trained models, but SAM-GIF is TracIn with SAM gradients and SAM-HIF's derivation contains a load-bearing error.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.