Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Benchmarking Robustness of 3D Object Detection to Common Corruptions in Autonomous Driving

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.11040 v1 pith:2TC5Z644 submitted 2023-03-20 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CR

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.CR
keywords corruptionsrobustnessmodelsdetectiondrivingobjectautonomousbenchmarks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

3D object detection is an important task in autonomous driving to perceive the surroundings. Despite the excellent performance, the existing 3D detectors lack the robustness to real-world corruptions caused by adverse weathers, sensor noises, etc., provoking concerns about the safety and reliability of autonomous driving systems. To comprehensively and rigorously benchmark the corruption robustness of 3D detectors, in this paper we design 27 types of common corruptions for both LiDAR and camera inputs considering real-world driving scenarios. By synthesizing these corruptions on public datasets, we establish three corruption robustness benchmarks -- KITTI-C, nuScenes-C, and Waymo-C. Then, we conduct large-scale experiments on 24 diverse 3D object detection models to evaluate their corruption robustness. Based on the evaluation results, we draw several important findings, including: 1) motion-level corruptions are the most threatening ones that lead to significant performance drop of all models; 2) LiDAR-camera fusion models demonstrate better robustness; 3) camera-only models are extremely vulnerable to image corruptions, showing the indispensability of LiDAR point clouds. We release the benchmarks and codes at https://github.com/kkkcx/3D_Corruptions_AD. We hope that our benchmarks and findings can provide insights for future research on developing robust 3D object detection models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Real-World Perturbation Testing of Autonomous Driving Systems

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Model-level and offline robustness metrics for 72 camera/LiDAR perturbations do not reliably predict closed-loop failures on a full-scale autonomous vehicle.

  2. Spatial RoboGrasp: Generalized Robotic Grasping Control Policy

    cs.RO 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Spatial RoboGrasp combines AugFusion, monocular depth, and grasp prompts in a diffusion policy, claiming large gains under exposure change, without released artifacts or error bars.

Pith tools