Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Neural Graph Reasoning: Complex Logical Query Answering Meets Graph Databases

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.14617 v1 pith:PYWHRBSL submitted 2023-03-26 cs.DB cs.AIcs.LG

Neural Graph Reasoning: Complex Logical Query Answering Meets Graph Databases

classification cs.DB cs.AIcs.LG
keywords graphneuralquerycomplexstoretaskclqadatabases
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Complex logical query answering (CLQA) is a recently emerged task of graph machine learning that goes beyond simple one-hop link prediction and solves a far more complex task of multi-hop logical reasoning over massive, potentially incomplete graphs in a latent space. The task received a significant traction in the community; numerous works expanded the field along theoretical and practical axes to tackle different types of complex queries and graph modalities with efficient systems. In this paper, we provide a holistic survey of CLQA with a detailed taxonomy studying the field from multiple angles, including graph types (modality, reasoning domain, background semantics), modeling aspects (encoder, processor, decoder), supported queries (operators, patterns, projected variables), datasets, evaluation metrics, and applications. Refining the CLQA task, we introduce the concept of Neural Graph Databases (NGDBs). Extending the idea of graph databases (graph DBs), NGDB consists of a Neural Graph Storage and a Neural Graph Engine. Inside Neural Graph Storage, we design a graph store, a feature store, and further embed information in a latent embedding store using an encoder. Given a query, Neural Query Engine learns how to perform query planning and execution in order to efficiently retrieve the correct results by interacting with the Neural Graph Storage. Compared with traditional graph DBs, NGDBs allow for a flexible and unified modeling of features in diverse modalities using the embedding store. Moreover, when the graph is incomplete, they can provide robust retrieval of answers which a normal graph DB cannot recover. Finally, we point out promising directions, unsolved problems and applications of NGDB for future research.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Neural Scalable Symbolic Search Framework for Complex Logical Queries with Multiple Free Variables

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    NS3 approximates joint ranking for EFO_k queries on KGs by merging free variables into hypernodes, pruning domains with dynamic budget B, and reducing to EFO_{k-1} queries, improving joint performance on three dataset...

  2. InductWave: Inductive Multi-Hop Logical Query Answering on Knowledge Graphs

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Combining graph wavelet embeddings with Neural Bellman-Ford message passing reduces the layers needed for inductive logical query answering on large knowledge graphs.

  3. KGPFN: Unlocking the Potential of Knowledge Graph Foundation Model via In-Context Learning

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    KGPFN pretrains on multiple KGs to learn relation patterns, then performs query-specific reasoning by encoding local context with NBFNet and global context via retrieved instances aggregated in a PFN with feature- and...

  4. CQD-SHAP: Explainable Complex Query Answering via Shapley Values

    cs.LG 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0

    CQD-SHAP uses Shapley values over query atoms to quantify how much neural (versus symbolic) execution of each atom contributes to a target answer's ranking in complex query answering.