Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

LLM as A Robotic Brain: Unifying Egocentric Memory and Control

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.09349 v4 pith:MIMOJMN2 submitted 2023-04-19 cs.AI cs.CLcs.RO

LLM as A Robotic Brain: Unifying Egocentric Memory and Control

classification cs.AI cs.CLcs.RO
keywords controlembodiedmemoryllm-braintasksegocentriclanguagerobot
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Embodied AI focuses on the study and development of intelligent systems that possess a physical or virtual embodiment (i.e. robots) and are able to dynamically interact with their environment. Memory and control are the two essential parts of an embodied system and usually require separate frameworks to model each of them. In this paper, we propose a novel and generalizable framework called LLM-Brain: using Large-scale Language Model as a robotic brain to unify egocentric memory and control. The LLM-Brain framework integrates multiple multimodal language models for robotic tasks, utilizing a zero-shot learning approach. All components within LLM-Brain communicate using natural language in closed-loop multi-round dialogues that encompass perception, planning, control, and memory. The core of the system is an embodied LLM to maintain egocentric memory and control the robot. We demonstrate LLM-Brain by examining two downstream tasks: active exploration and embodied question answering. The active exploration tasks require the robot to extensively explore an unknown environment within a limited number of actions. Meanwhile, the embodied question answering tasks necessitate that the robot answers questions based on observations acquired during prior explorations.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Attention at Rest Stays at Rest: Breaking Visual Inertia for Cognitive Hallucination Mitigation

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Visual attention in MLLMs shows inertia that hinders cognitive inference on object relations, addressed by a training-free Inertia-aware Visual Excitation method that selects dynamically emerging tokens and applies an...

  2. Attention at Rest Stays at Rest: Breaking Visual Inertia for Cognitive Hallucination Mitigation

    cs.CV 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    Visual attention in MLLMs freezes early during decoding; IVE breaks that inertia by exciting emergent visual tokens and penalizing persistent ones, reducing cognitive relation hallucinations without training.

  3. Analyzing and Mitigating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models

    cs.LG 2023-10 conditional novelty 6.0

    LURE reduces object hallucination in LVLMs by 23% via post-hoc revision informed by co-occurrence, uncertainty, and text position analysis.

  4. Describe, Explain, Plan and Select: Interactive Planning with Large Language Models Enables Open-World Multi-Task Agents

    cs.AI 2023-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    DEPS combines LLM-based interactive planning with a trainable goal selector to create a zero-shot multi-task agent that completes 70+ Minecraft tasks and nearly doubles prior performance.