REVIEW 2 cited by
Multimodal Composite Association Score: Measuring Gender Bias in Generative Multimodal Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Generative multimodal models based on diffusion models have seen tremendous growth and advances in recent years. Models such as DALL-E and Stable Diffusion have become increasingly popular and successful at creating images from texts, often combining abstract ideas. However, like other deep learning models, they also reflect social biases they inherit from their training data, which is often crawled from the internet. Manually auditing models for biases can be very time and resource consuming and is further complicated by the unbounded and unconstrained nature of inputs these models can take. Research into bias measurement and quantification has generally focused on small single-stage models working on a single modality. Thus the emergence of multistage multimodal models requires a different approach. In this paper, we propose Multimodal Composite Association Score (MCAS) as a new method of measuring gender bias in multimodal generative models. Evaluating both DALL-E 2 and Stable Diffusion using this approach uncovered the presence of gendered associations of concepts embedded within the models. We propose MCAS as an accessible and scalable method of quantifying potential bias for models with different modalities and a range of potential biases.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
From Individuals to Interactions: Benchmarking Gender Bias in Multimodal Large Language Models from the Lens of Social Relationship
Dual-character narrative prompts reveal gender biases in six multimodal LLMs that are largely invisible in single-character evaluations, and GENRES provides a structured benchmark to measure them.
-
Bias, Accuracy, and Trust: Gender-Diverse Perspectives on Large Language Models
Gender-diverse users perceive ChatGPT's gender bias differently, with non-binary/transgender participants reporting condescending and stereotypical responses, and men reporting higher trust.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.