REVIEW 3 cited by
Self-Chained Image-Language Model for Video Localization and Question Answering
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recent studies have shown promising results on utilizing large pre-trained image-language models for video question answering. While these image-language models can efficiently bootstrap the representation learning of video-language models, they typically concatenate uniformly sampled video frames as visual inputs without explicit language-aware, temporal modeling. When only a portion of a video input is relevant to the language query, such uniform frame sampling can often lead to missing important visual cues. Although humans often find a video moment to focus on and rewind the moment to answer questions, training a query-aware video moment localizer often requires expensive annotations and high computational costs. To address this issue, we propose Self-Chained Video Localization-Answering (SeViLA), a novel framework that leverages a single image-language model (BLIP-2) to tackle both temporal keyframe localization and QA on videos. SeViLA framework consists of two modules: Localizer and Answerer, where both are parameter-efficiently fine-tuned from BLIP-2. We propose two ways of chaining these modules for cascaded inference and self-refinement. First, in the forward chain, the Localizer finds multiple language-aware keyframes in a video, which the Answerer uses to predict the answer. Second, in the reverse chain, the Answerer generates keyframe pseudo-labels to refine the Localizer, alleviating the need for expensive video moment localization annotations. Our SeViLA framework outperforms several strong baselines on 5 challenging video QA and event prediction benchmarks, and achieves the state-of-the-art in both fine-tuning (NExT-QA, STAR) and zero-shot (NExT-QA, STAR, How2QA, VLEP) settings. We also analyze the impact of Localizer, comparisons of Localizer with other temporal localization models, pre-training/self-refinement of Localizer, and varying the number of keyframes.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
TimeThink: Reasoning with Time for Video LLMs
TimeThink adds step-wise temporal process rewards (max IoU of referenced intervals) to GRPO for Video-LLMs, improving grounding and reasoning over outcome-only RL baselines.
-
VideoForest: Person-Anchored Hierarchical Reasoning for Cross-Video Question Answering
A person-anchored tree plus multi-agent LLM pipeline lets a system answer cross-video queries about the same person, and it beats single-video models on the authors' new CrossVideoQA benchmark.
-
Tempo-R0: A Video-MLLM for Temporal Video Grounding through Efficient Temporal Sensing Reinforcement Learning
A video-language model that combines adaptive frame sampling, explicit timestamps, and a reinforcement-learning reward for refusing irrelevant queries, beating prior methods on QVHighlights by about 3.5%.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.