Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Divide-and-Conquer the NAS puzzle in Resource Constrained Federated Learning Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.07135 v1 pith:G2Y42EHB submitted 2023-05-11 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CV

Divide-and-Conquer the NAS puzzle in Resource Constrained Federated Learning Systems

classification cs.LG cs.AIcs.CV
keywords federatedlearningsamplingapproachsearchdc-nasdevicesdistance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Federated Learning (FL) is a privacy-preserving distributed machine learning approach geared towards applications in edge devices. However, the problem of designing custom neural architectures in federated environments is not tackled from the perspective of overall system efficiency. In this paper, we propose DC-NAS -- a divide-and-conquer approach that performs supernet-based Neural Architecture Search (NAS) in a federated system by systematically sampling the search space. We propose a novel diversified sampling strategy that balances exploration and exploitation of the search space by initially maximizing the distance between the samples and progressively shrinking this distance as the training progresses. We then perform channel pruning to reduce the training complexity at the devices further. We show that our approach outperforms several sampling strategies including Hadamard sampling, where the samples are maximally separated. We evaluate our method on the CIFAR10, CIFAR100, EMNIST, and TinyImagenet benchmarks and show a comprehensive analysis of different aspects of federated learning such as scalability, and non-IID data. DC-NAS achieves near iso-accuracy as compared to full-scale federated NAS with 50% fewer resources.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.