Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Teamwork Is Not Always Good: An Empirical Study of Classifier Drift in Class-incremental Information Extraction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.16559 v1 pith:A5KV7JKF submitted 2023-05-26 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords classeslearningclassifierclass-incrementaldriftforgettingclassifiersespecially
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Class-incremental learning (CIL) aims to develop a learning system that can continually learn new classes from a data stream without forgetting previously learned classes. When learning classes incrementally, the classifier must be constantly updated to incorporate new classes, and the drift in decision boundary may lead to severe forgetting. This fundamental challenge, however, has not yet been studied extensively, especially in the setting where no samples from old classes are stored for rehearsal. In this paper, we take a closer look at how the drift in the classifier leads to forgetting, and accordingly, design four simple yet (super-) effective solutions to alleviate the classifier drift: an Individual Classifiers with Frozen Feature Extractor (ICE) framework where we individually train a classifier for each learning session, and its three variants ICE-PL, ICE-O, and ICE-PL&O which further take the logits of previously learned classes from old sessions or a constant logit of an Other class as a constraint to the learning of new classifiers. Extensive experiments and analysis on 6 class-incremental information extraction tasks demonstrate that our solutions, especially ICE-O, consistently show significant improvement over the previous state-of-the-art approaches with up to 44.7% absolute F-score gain, providing a strong baseline and insights for future research on class-incremental learning.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. GDI-Bench: A Benchmark for General Document Intelligence with Vision and Reasoning Decoupling

    cs.CL 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A document-intelligence benchmark decouples visual and reasoning complexity, and a parameter-freezing fine-tuning method improves an 8B model without catastrophic forgetting.

  2. Spurious Forgetting in Continual Learning of Language Models

    cs.LG 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Performance drops in continual learning can be 'spurious': knowledge remains intact while task alignment is lost, and freezing lower layers mitigates the loss.

Pith tools