REVIEW 1 cited by
Interpretable and Explainable Logical Policies via Neurally Guided Symbolic Abstraction
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Interpretable and Explainable Logical Policies via Neurally Guided Symbolic Abstraction
read the original abstract
The limited priors required by neural networks make them the dominating choice to encode and learn policies using reinforcement learning (RL). However, they are also black-boxes, making it hard to understand the agent's behaviour, especially when working on the image level. Therefore, neuro-symbolic RL aims at creating policies that are interpretable in the first place. Unfortunately, interpretability is not explainability. To achieve both, we introduce Neurally gUided Differentiable loGic policiEs (NUDGE). NUDGE exploits trained neural network-based agents to guide the search of candidate-weighted logic rules, then uses differentiable logic to train the logic agents. Our experimental evaluation demonstrates that NUDGE agents can induce interpretable and explainable policies while outperforming purely neural ones and showing good flexibility to environments of different initial states and problem sizes.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
EntailLLM: Verifying LLM-Generated Vulnerability Discovery Paths with Domain Knowledge via Logic Programming
A logic-based verifier using temporal annotated logic raises the share of LLM-proposed vulnerability exploration paths that satisfy domain knowledge from 78% to 98%.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.