REVIEW 3 cited by
A Poincar\'e covariant cascade method for high-energy nuclear collisions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We present a Poincar\'e covariant cascade algorithm based on the constrained Hamiltonian dynamics in an $8N$-dimensional phase space to simulate the Boltzmann-type two-body collision term. We compare this covariant cascade algorithm with traditional $6N$-dimensional phase-space cascade algorithms. To validate the covariant cascade algorithm, we perform box calculations. We examine the frame dependence of the algorithm in a one-dimensionally expanding system as well as the compression stages of colliding two nuclei. We confirm that our covariant cascade method is reliable to simulate high-energy nuclear collisions. Furthermore, we present Lorentz-covariant equations of motion for the $N$-body system interacting via potentials, which can be efficiently solved numerically.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Poincar\'e covariant quantum molecular dynamics: a covariant description of a system of interacting wave packets
The authors derive Poincaré-covariant mean-field equations of motion for relativistic QMD and show they match Monte-Carlo integration of the exact forces in heavy-ion collisions.
-
Space-time regions of high baryon density and baryon stopping in heavy-ion collisions
3FD hydrodynamics predicts larger and longer-lived regions of dense baryon matter in Au+Au collisions at 3–19.6 GeV than JAM transport, with V4(3n0) decreasing monotonically with energy.
-
A Brief Introduction to PACIAE 4.0
PACIAE 4.0 is a new public release of an event generator that adds PYTHIA 8.3 support, heavy-quark mass corrections, an improved coalescence model, and new hadron channels, but no validation is shown.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.