Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Fact-Checking of AI-Generated Reports

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.14634 v2 pith:UQLKOGF4 submitted 2023-07-27 cs.AI cs.CRcs.CVcs.LGeess.IV

classification cs.AIcs.CRcs.CVcs.LGeess.IV
keywords reportsfakerealsentencesexaminerfindingsimagesai-generated
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

With advances in generative artificial intelligence (AI), it is now possible to produce realistic-looking automated reports for preliminary reads of radiology images. This can expedite clinical workflows, improve accuracy and reduce overall costs. However, it is also well-known that such models often hallucinate, leading to false findings in the generated reports. In this paper, we propose a new method of fact-checking of AI-generated reports using their associated images. Specifically, the developed examiner differentiates real and fake sentences in reports by learning the association between an image and sentences describing real or potentially fake findings. To train such an examiner, we first created a new dataset of fake reports by perturbing the findings in the original ground truth radiology reports associated with images. Text encodings of real and fake sentences drawn from these reports are then paired with image encodings to learn the mapping to real/fake labels. The utility of such an examiner is demonstrated for verifying automatically generated reports by detecting and removing fake sentences. Future generative AI approaches can use the resulting tool to validate their reports leading to a more responsible use of AI in expediting clinical workflows.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CarbonChat: Large Language Model-Based Corporate Carbon Emission Analysis and Climate Knowledge Q&A System

    cs.CL 2025-01 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    CarbonChat combines self-prompting RAG and text-to-SQL for carbon-emission report analysis, reporting internal ablation gains but no external baselines or released artifacts.

Pith tools