REVIEW 8 cited by
Hamiltonian Analysis of f(Q) Gravity and the Failure of the Dirac-Bergmann Algorithm for Teleparallel Theories of Gravity
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Hamiltonian Analysis of f(Q) Gravity and the Failure of the Dirac-Bergmann Algorithm for Teleparallel Theories of Gravity
read the original abstract
In recent years, $f(Q)$ gravity has enjoyed considerable attention in the literature and important results have been obtained. However, the question of how many physical degrees of freedom the theory propagates -- and how this number may depend on the form of the function $f$ -- has not been answered satisfactorily. In this article we show that a Hamiltonian analysis based on the Dirac-Bergmann algorithm -- one of the standard methods to address this type of question -- fails. We isolate the source of the failure, show that other commonly considered teleparallel theories of gravity are affected by the same problem, and we point out that the number of degrees of freedom obtained in Phys. Rev. D 106 no. 4, (2022) by K. Hu, T. Katsuragawa, and T. Qui (namely eight), based on the Dirac-Bergmann algorithm, is wrong. Using a different approach, we show that the upper bound on the degrees of freedom is seven. Finally, we propose a more promising strategy for settling this important question.
Forward citations
Cited by 8 Pith papers
-
Degrees of freedom of a quadratic scalar-nonmetricity theory
In quadratic scalar-nonmetricity gravity, Hamiltonian analysis shows 10, 8, and 8 degrees of freedom for cases II, V, and VI, while linear cosmological perturbation theory sees only 10, 6, and 5, indicating hidden str...
-
Neutron stars in $f(\mathbb{Q})$ gravity
For f(Q)=Q+αQ² and f(Q)=Q^β, neutron-star solutions that admit power-series expansions at the center or at infinity collapse to General Relativity; genuine beyond-GR effects must be non-analytic.
-
Extrinsic geometry and Hamiltonian analysis of symmetric teleparallel gravity
Symmetric teleparallel gravity has the same number of degrees of freedom as general relativity, confirmed via its Hamiltonian formulation after deriving generalized extrinsic geometry relations.
-
Constraints on Logarithmic Model Extensions of Symmetric Teleparallel Gravity
Two new logarithmic f(Q) gravity models fit current cosmological data and predict contrasting, testable deviations in the effective gravitational coupling and gravitational-wave damping.
-
Neutron stars in $f(Q) = Q +\xi Q^2$ gravity
In f(Q)=Q+ξQ² gravity with realistic EOSs, negative ξ increases neutron-star maximum masses while positive ξ decreases them, with exterior spacetime remaining Schwarzschild.
-
ACT-DR6 consistent inflation in generalised entropic cosmology and $f(Q)$ gravity
Reconstruction produces explicit f(Q) and generalised-entropic inflation models (and scalar-coupled versions) whose slow-roll parameters match ACT-DR6 + Planck-BAO constraints on n_s and r.
-
Decoupling perturbations from background in $f(Q)$ gravity: the square-root correction and the impact on the $\sigma_8$ tension
A sqrt(Q) correction in f(Q) gravity suppresses structure growth without altering the expansion history; fitted to RSD/DESI data it can bring sigma8 into agreement with Planck, at the cost of a sigma8-M degeneracy.
-
Dynamical Dark Energy or Modified Gravity? Signatures in Gravitational Wave Propagation
Reconstructing the dark energy density from DESI BAO and DESyr5 supernovae, then recasting it as f(Q) gravity, predicts a low-redshift gravitational wave damping ν≈0.18 (≳2σ from GR) only for the DESyr5 dataset.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.