Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Bias Behind the Wheel: Fairness Testing of Autonomous Driving Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.02935 v4 pith:3PQ5UVRJ submitted 2023-08-05 cs.CY cs.AIcs.CVcs.SE

classification cs.CYcs.AIcs.CVcs.SE
keywords fairnessdrivingpedestriandetectorsautonomouslabelstestingdatasets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper conducts fairness testing of automated pedestrian detection, a crucial but under-explored issue in autonomous driving systems. We evaluate eight state-of-the-art deep learning-based pedestrian detectors across demographic groups on large-scale real-world datasets. To enable thorough fairness testing, we provide extensive annotations for the datasets, resulting in 8,311 images with 16,070 gender labels, 20,115 age labels, and 3,513 skin tone labels. Our findings reveal significant fairness issues, particularly related to age. The proportion of undetected children is 20.14% higher compared to adults. Furthermore, we explore how various driving scenarios affect the fairness of pedestrian detectors. We find that pedestrian detectors demonstrate significant gender biases during night time, potentially exacerbating the prevalent societal issue of female safety concerns during nighttime out. Moreover, we observe that pedestrian detectors can demonstrate both enhanced fairness and superior performance under specific driving conditions, which challenges the fairness-performance trade-off theory widely acknowledged in the fairness literature. We publicly release the code, data, and results to support future research on fairness in autonomous driving.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Pragmatic Frames of Spurious Correlations in Machine Learning: Interpreting How and Why They Matter

    cs.LG 2024-11 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    ML researchers assess spurious correlations via four pragmatic frames (relevance, generalizability, human-likeness, harmfulness) rather than a fixed statistical definition.

  2. Fairness-Aware Grouping for Continuous Sensitive Variables: Application for Debiasing Face Analysis with respect to Skin Tone

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A fairness-based grouping algorithm that partitions a continuous sensitive attribute into subgroups with maximally different discrimination levels, validated on synthetic data and face images.

Pith tools