Is There Any Social Principle for LLM-Based Agents?

Jitao Bai; Simiao Zhang; Zhonghao Chen

Is There Any Social Principle for LLM-Based Agents?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.11136 v2 pith:6SNRKTNM submitted 2023-08-22 cs.CY cs.AIcs.SI

Is There Any Social Principle for LLM-Based Agents?

Jitao Bai , Simiao Zhang , Zhonghao Chen This is my paper

classification cs.CY cs.AIcs.SI

keywords agentsshouldsocialagentalignmentapplicationargueattention

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

0 comments

read the original abstract

Focus on Large Language Model based agents should involve more than "human-centered" alignment or application. We argue that more attention should be paid to the agent itself and discuss the potential of establishing tailored social sciences for agents.

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

The Moltbook Files: A Harmless Slopocalypse or Humanity's Last Experiment
cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

An AI-agent social platform generated mostly neutral content whose use in fine-tuning reduced model truthfulness comparably to human Reddit data, suggesting limited unique harm but flagging tail risks like secret leaks.