Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Can I Trust Your Answer? Visually Grounded Video Question Answering

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.01327 v2 pith:6TVWB2TU submitted 2023-09-04 cs.CV cs.AIcs.MM

Can I Trust Your Answer? Visually Grounded Video Question Answering

classification cs.CV cs.AIcs.MM
keywords vlmsgroundingnext-gqaanswergroundedmodelspredictionstechniques
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We study visually grounded VideoQA in response to the emerging trends of utilizing pretraining techniques for video-language understanding. Specifically, by forcing vision-language models (VLMs) to answer questions and simultaneously provide visual evidence, we seek to ascertain the extent to which the predictions of such techniques are genuinely anchored in relevant video content, versus spurious correlations from language or irrelevant visual context. Towards this, we construct NExT-GQA -- an extension of NExT-QA with 10.5$K$ temporal grounding (or location) labels tied to the original QA pairs. With NExT-GQA, we scrutinize a series of state-of-the-art VLMs. Through post-hoc attention analysis, we find that these models are extremely weak in substantiating the answers despite their strong QA performance. This exposes the limitation of current VLMs in making reliable predictions. As a remedy, we further explore and propose a grounded-QA method via Gaussian mask optimization and cross-modal learning. Experiments with different backbones demonstrate that this grounding mechanism improves both grounding and QA. With these efforts, we aim to push towards trustworthy VLMs in VQA systems. Our dataset and code are available at https://github.com/doc-doc/NExT-GQA.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. AdaThinkV: Adaptive Thinking for Token-Efficient Video Reasoning

    cs.CV 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0

    A video reasoning model learns per question whether to reason aloud or answer directly, improving accuracy by about 3 points over the best adaptive baseline while using about 23% fewer output tokens.

  2. S-EMBER: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Streaming Egocentric Memory Retrieval

    cs.CV 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0

    Frontier multimodal models improve semantic recall with scale yet fail to localize the visual evidence that supports their answers on a new streaming egocentric memory benchmark.

  3. SnapAudit: Active Auditing of Differentially Private In-Context Learning via Snapshot-Based Simulation

    cs.CR 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0

    SnapAudit decomposes DP-ICL into a deterministic snapshot stage and a stochastic noise stage, using bootstrap simulation to achieve 80-200x faster auditing and exposing privacy bound violations in existing Gaussian an...