Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

HC3 Plus: A Semantic-Invariant Human ChatGPT Comparison Corpus

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.02731 v4 pith:WMOO6QJL submitted 2023-09-06 cs.CL cs.AI

HC3 Plus: A Semantic-Invariant Human ChatGPT Comparison Corpus

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords taskssemantic-invariantchatgptdetectingtextchallengingfine-tuninginstruction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

ChatGPT has garnered significant interest due to its impressive performance; however, there is growing concern about its potential risks, particularly in the detection of AI-generated content (AIGC), which is often challenging for untrained individuals to identify. Current datasets used for detecting ChatGPT-generated text primarily focus on question-answering tasks, often overlooking tasks with semantic-invariant properties, such as summarization, translation, and paraphrasing. In this paper, we demonstrate that detecting model-generated text in semantic-invariant tasks is more challenging. To address this gap, we introduce a more extensive and comprehensive dataset that incorporates a wider range of tasks than previous work, including those with semantic-invariant properties. In addition, instruction fine-tuning has demonstrated superior performance across various tasks. In this paper, we explore the use of instruction fine-tuning models for detecting text generated by ChatGPT.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Telescope: Improving Zero Shot Detection of LLM Generated Content By Measuring Token Repetition Probability

    cs.CL 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0

    Telescope Perplexity, the average negative log probability a reference LM assigns to each token immediately after seeing it, yields strong zero-shot LLM-text detection by probing an early-training aversion to repetition.

  2. Hitting a Moving Target: Test-Time Adaptation for AI Text Detection under Continual Distribution Shift

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Test-time adaptation with semi-supervised learning leverages inference-time homogeneity to maintain AI text detection performance under adversarial humanization, new LLMs, and temporal drift.

  3. DetectZoo: A Unified Toolkit for AI-Generated Content Detection Across Text, Audio, and Image Modalities

    cs.MM 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DetectZoo is a unified toolkit providing reference implementations of 61 detectors, native loaders for 22 benchmark datasets, and a standardized evaluation pipeline for AI-generated content detection across text, audi...

  4. MAGA-Bench: Machine-Augment-Generated Text via Alignment Detection Benchmark

    cs.CL 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0

    Adding human-alignment augmentation (roleplaying, BPO, self-refine, RLDF) to machine-generated text both fools existing detectors and improves the generalization of detectors fine-tuned on it.

  5. Feature-Augmented Transformers for Robust AI-Text Detection Across Domains and Generators

    cs.CL 2026-05 conditional novelty 5.0

    Feature-augmented DeBERTa-v3-base with attention-based fusion reaches 85.9% balanced accuracy on the multi-domain M4 benchmark under fixed-threshold evaluation, outperforming zero-shot baselines by up to 7.22 points.