REVIEW 8 cited by
Corex: Pushing the Boundaries of Complex Reasoning through Multi-Model Collaboration
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Corex: Pushing the Boundaries of Complex Reasoning through Multi-Model Collaboration
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) are evolving at an unprecedented pace and have exhibited considerable capability in the realm of natural language processing (NLP) with world knowledge. Benefiting from ultra-large-scale training corpora, a single LLM can manage typical NLP tasks competently. However, its performance in executing reasoning tasks is still confined by the limitations of its internal representations. To push this boundary further, we introduce Corex in this paper, a suite of novel general-purpose strategies that transform LLMs into autonomous agents pioneering multi-model collaborations for complex task-solving. Inspired by human behaviors, Corex is constituted by diverse collaboration paradigms including Debate, Review, and Retrieve modes, which collectively work towards enhancing the factuality, faithfulness, and reliability of the reasoning process. These paradigms foster task-agnostic approaches that enable LLMs to ''think outside the box,'' thereby overcoming hallucinations and providing better solutions. Through extensive experiments across four different types of reasoning tasks, we demonstrate that orchestrating multiple LLMs to work in concert yields substantially better performance compared to existing methods. Further results and in-depth analysis demonstrate the cost-effectiveness of our method, facilitating collaboration among different LLMs and promoting annotation efficiency.
Forward citations
Cited by 8 Pith papers
-
The Moltbook Files: A Harmless Slopocalypse or Humanity's Last Experiment
An AI-agent social platform generated mostly neutral content whose use in fine-tuning reduced model truthfulness comparably to human Reddit data, suggesting limited unique harm but flagging tail risks like secret leaks.
-
GUI-R1 : A Generalist R1-Style Vision-Language Action Model For GUI Agents
GUI-R1 uses reinforcement fine-tuning with GRPO on a small curated dataset to create a generalist vision-language action model that outperforms prior GUI agent methods across mobile, desktop, and web benchmarks using ...
-
IR-Agent: Expert-Inspired LLM Agents for Structure Elucidation from Infrared Spectra
IR-Agent is a multi-agent LLM framework that emulates expert IR spectral analysis procedures to improve molecular structure elucidation accuracy and adaptability.
-
OS-ATLAS: A Foundation Action Model for Generalist GUI Agents
OS-Atlas, trained on the largest open-source cross-platform GUI grounding corpus of 13 million elements, outperforms prior open-source models on six benchmarks across mobile, desktop, and web platforms.
-
SeeClick: Harnessing GUI Grounding for Advanced Visual GUI Agents
SeeClick improves visual GUI agents via GUI grounding pre-training on automatically curated data and introduces the ScreenSpot benchmark, with results indicating that stronger grounding boosts downstream task performance.
-
AdaSwitch: Adaptive Switching between Small and Large Agents for Effective Cloud-Local Collaborative Learning
AdaSwitch improves small local LLM performance on reasoning tasks by adaptively switching to a large cloud LLM upon detected errors, sometimes matching cloud results with far less overhead.
-
Human-LLM Dialogue Improves Diagnostic Accuracy in Emergency Care
Interactive LLM dialogue raised residents' hard-case diagnostic correctness from 0.589 to 0.734 and produced medium effect sizes in a blinded study of seven physicians on 52 emergency cases.
-
A Survey on Efficient Inference for Large Language Models
The paper surveys techniques to speed up and reduce the resource needs of LLM inference, organized by data-level, model-level, and system-level changes, with comparative experiments on representative methods.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.