Pith. sign in

REVIEW 22 cited by

LLM Lies: Hallucinations are not Bugs, but Features as Adversarial Examples

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.01469 v3 pith:FF3UB24S submitted 2023-10-02 cs.CL cs.AI

LLM Lies: Hallucinations are not Bugs, but Features as Adversarial Examples

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords adversarialhallucinationllmsexamplesbasicgithubhallucinationshowever
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs), including GPT-3.5, LLaMA, and PaLM, seem to be knowledgeable and able to adapt to many tasks. However, we still cannot completely trust their answers, since LLMs suffer from \textbf{hallucination}\textemdash fabricating non-existent facts, deceiving users with or without their awareness. However, the reasons for their existence and pervasiveness remain unclear. In this paper, we demonstrate that nonsensical prompts composed of random tokens can also elicit the LLMs to respond with hallucinations. Moreover, we provide both theoretical and experimental evidence that transformers can be manipulated to produce specific pre-define tokens by perturbing its input sequence. This phenomenon forces us to revisit that \emph{hallucination may be another view of adversarial examples}, and it shares similar characteristics with conventional adversarial examples as a basic property of LLMs. Therefore, we formalize an automatic hallucination triggering method as the \textit{hallucination attack} in an adversarial way. Finally, we explore the basic properties of attacked adversarial prompts and propose a simple yet effective defense strategy. Our code is released on GitHub\footnote{https://github.com/PKU-YuanGroup/Hallucination-Attack}.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 22 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. REALISTA: Realistic Latent Adversarial Attacks that Elicit LLM Hallucinations

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    REALISTA optimizes continuous combinations of valid editing directions in latent space to produce realistic adversarial prompts that elicit hallucinations more effectively than prior methods, including on large reason...

  2. Parasites in the Toolchain: A Large-Scale Analysis of Attacks on the MCP Ecosystem

    cs.CR 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    This paper defines a new Parasitic Toolchain Attack pattern (MCP-UPD) that assembles legitimate tools into privacy-exfiltrating workflows and reports the first large-scale scan of 12230 MCP tools across 1360 servers r...

  3. SelfGrader: LLM Jailbreak Detection via Anchored Token-Level Logits

    cs.CR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    SelfGrader detects LLM jailbreaks by interpreting logit distributions on numerical tokens with a dual maliciousness-benignness score, cutting attack success rates up to 22.66% while using up to 173x less memory and 26...

  4. When Search Goes Wrong: Red-Teaming Web-Augmented Large Language Models

    cs.CR 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    CREST-Search is a red-teaming framework that crafts seemingly benign search queries to induce unsafe citations from web-augmented LLMs, backed by a new WebSearch-Harm dataset for fine-tuning a specialized attacker model.

  5. Efficient Black-Box Fault Localization for System-Level Test Code Using Large Language Models

    cs.SE 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A black-box LLM approach for fault localization in system-level test code that estimates execution traces from failure logs to rank potential faults with reduced inference cost.

  6. Like a Hammer, It Can Build, It Can Break: Large Language Model Uses, Perceptions, and Adoption in Cybersecurity Operations on Reddit

    cs.CR 2026-04 accept novelty 6.5

    Reddit analysis of 892 posts shows SOC practitioners adopt LLMs mainly for controllable productivity work and constrain autonomy due to reliability, security, and cost concerns.

  7. DICA: Dual-Indicator Guided Contrastive Alignment in Multimodal Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Monitoring attention entropy and image-output correlation during decoding, then applying targeted contrastive corrections, reduces hallucination in multimodal LLMs without retraining.

  8. Efficient Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Token Co-occurrence Graphs

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    TIGRAG constructs token co-occurrence graphs for scalable graph-augmented RAG and uses iterative entity-driven retrieval to improve multi-hop QA performance over dense and prior graph methods.

  9. REALISTA: Realistic Latent Adversarial Attacks that Elicit LLM Hallucinations

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    REALISTA generates semantically coherent adversarial prompts via latent-space optimization over input-dependent editing directions, achieving stronger hallucination elicitation than prior realistic attacks on open-sou...

  10. SelfGrader: LLM Jailbreak Detection via Anchored Token-Level Logits

    cs.CR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    SelfGrader grades query harmfulness from anchored numerical-token logits plus PAC-guided dual-perspective ICL, claiming strong jailbreak detection with low FPR and latency.

  11. Principled Detection of Hallucinations in Large Language Models via Multiple Testing

    cs.CL 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The method aggregates multiple hallucination evaluation scores via conformal p-values to enable calibrated detection with controlled false alarm rates across LLMs and datasets.

  12. MolReFlect: Towards In-Context Fine-grained Alignments between Molecules and Texts

    cs.CL 2024-11 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    MolReFlect introduces a teacher-student framework that automatically creates fine-grained molecule-text alignments to achieve SOTA results on molecule-caption translation.

  13. SeeMe: Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models through Effective Visual Token Engineering

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5

    Restructuring visual tokens via cross-modal prune–merge–refine consistently lowers hallucination rates on MME, POPE and AMBER across four 7B LVLMs without any training.

  14. How Jailbreak Attacks Inform Safety Alignment: A Defender-Centric, Shapley-Based Evaluation of Jailbreak Contributions

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Attacks that break LLMs best are not the ones that improve safety most; a Shapley- and greedy-based framework that selects attack subsets by downstream defender utility outperforms attacker-centric and attribution-onl...

  15. Dive into Ambiguity: A*-Inspired Multi-Agents Commonsense Obfuscation Attack on LLM Prompts

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    An A*-inspired multi-agent framework with hierarchical rewriting and a dynamic gamma parameter generates obfuscated prompts that achieve higher LLM attack success rates with fewer attempts than exhaustive search.

  16. Like a Hammer, It Can Build, It Can Break: Large Language Model Uses, Perceptions, and Adoption in Cybersecurity Operations on Reddit

    cs.CR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Security practitioners use LLMs independently for low-risk productivity tasks while showing interest in enterprise platforms, but reliability, verification needs, and security risks limit broader autonomy.

  17. LLM-EDT: Large Language Model Enhanced Cross-domain Sequential Recommendation with Dual-phase Training

    cs.IR 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    LLM-EDT improves cross-domain sequential recommendation by using LLMs for transferable item augmentation, dual-phase training to handle domain transitions, and domain-aware profiling to build user profiles.

  18. Investigating Symbolic Triggers of Hallucination in Gemma Models Across HaluEval and TruthfulQA

    cs.CL 2025-09 reject novelty 5.0

    Symbolic triggers like modifiers and named entities keep Gemma hallucination rates at 64-79% across model scales, suggesting larger models do not eliminate this failure mode.

  19. QueryBandits for Hallucination Mitigation: Exploiting Semantic Features for No-Regret Rewriting

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0

    A contextual bandit that chooses among five query-rewrite strategies, conditioned on 17 linguistic features, reduces LLM hallucination on QA benchmarks and beats static prompting and no-rewrite baselines.

  20. Hybrid Adversarial Defence for Natural Language Understanding Tasks

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Hybrid entropy-uncertainty-geometric defence improves clean accuracy by up to 43% and adversarial robustness by up to 65% on NLU and security benchmarks.

  21. Breaking to Build: A Threat Model of Prompt-Based Attacks for Securing LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 3.0

    A survey categorizing prompt-based attacks on LLMs into four classes and proposing aspirational goals of un-distillable, un-finetunable, and un-editable models.

  22. Charting the Future of Scholarly Knowledge with AI: A Community Perspective

    cs.DL 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    A community perspective on how AI can support scholarly knowledge extraction, organization, and communication, with a proposed classification and ethical considerations.