Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

KCTS: Knowledge-Constrained Tree Search Decoding with Token-Level Hallucination Detection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.09044 v1 pith:WQNXOCBU submitted 2023-10-13 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords knowledgedecodingmethodcalledhallucinationkctsknowledge-constrainedlanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable human-level natural language generation capabilities. However, their potential to generate misinformation, often called the hallucination problem, poses a significant risk to their deployment. A common approach to address this issue is to retrieve relevant knowledge and fine-tune the LLM with the knowledge in its input. Unfortunately, this method incurs high training costs and may cause catastrophic forgetting for multi-tasking models. To overcome these limitations, we propose a knowledge-constrained decoding method called KCTS (Knowledge-Constrained Tree Search), which guides a frozen LM to generate text aligned with the reference knowledge at each decoding step using a knowledge classifier score and MCTS (Monte-Carlo Tree Search). To adapt the sequence-level knowledge classifier to token-level guidance, we also propose a novel token-level hallucination detection method called RIPA (Reward Inflection Point Approximation). Our empirical results on knowledge-grounded dialogue and abstractive summarization demonstrate the strength of KCTS as a plug-and-play, model-agnostic decoding method that can effectively reduce hallucinations in natural language generation.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. POSTCONDBENCH: Benchmarking Correctness and Completeness in Formal Postcondition Inference

    cs.SE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    POSTCONDBENCH is a new multilingual benchmark that evaluates LLM postcondition generation on real code using defect discrimination to assess completeness beyond surface matching.

  2. ToolPRM: Fine-Grained Inference Scaling of Structured Outputs for Function Calling

    cs.AI 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    ToolPRM provides fine-grained intra-call process supervision via a new dataset and reward model, outperforming outcome and coarse-grained alternatives on function-calling benchmarks.

  3. It's Not That Simple. An Analysis of Simple Test-Time Scaling

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The apparent scaling behavior of the s1 model is mostly an artifact of truncating long outputs, while appending 'Wait' does not reliably improve answers.

  4. Breaking the Myth: Can Small Models Infer Postconditions Too?

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Fine-tuning Qwen2.5-Coder-7B on 1.5K reasoning examples yields postcondition generation close to GPT-4o and better than 32B open models on Defects4J.

  5. A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions

    cs.CL 2023-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper surveys hallucination in LLMs with an innovative taxonomy, factors, detection methods, benchmarks, mitigation strategies, and open research directions.

Pith tools