Pith. sign in

REVIEW

SortNet: Learning To Rank By a Neural-Based Sorting Algorithm

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.01864 v1 pith:CAK5MI74 submitted 2023-11-03 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CLcs.IR

SortNet: Learning To Rank By a Neural-Based Sorting Algorithm

classification cs.LG cs.AIcs.CLcs.IR
keywords objectsalgorithmexamplesfunctionrankingrelevancealgorithmsarchitecture
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The problem of relevance ranking consists of sorting a set of objects with respect to a given criterion. Since users may prefer different relevance criteria, the ranking algorithms should be adaptable to the user needs. Two main approaches exist in literature for the task of learning to rank: 1) a score function, learned by examples, which evaluates the properties of each object yielding an absolute relevance value that can be used to order the objects or 2) a pairwise approach, where a "preference function" is learned using pairs of objects to define which one has to be ranked first. In this paper, we present SortNet, an adaptive ranking algorithm which orders objects using a neural network as a comparator. The neural network training set provides examples of the desired ordering between pairs of items and it is constructed by an iterative procedure which, at each iteration, adds the most informative training examples. Moreover, the comparator adopts a connectionist architecture that is particularly suited for implementing a preference function. We also prove that such an architecture has the universal approximation property and can implement a wide class of functions. Finally, the proposed algorithm is evaluated on the LETOR dataset showing promising performances in comparison with other state of the art algorithms.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.