Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Don't Waste a Single Annotation: Improving Single-Label Classifiers Through Soft Labels

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.05265 v1 pith:ZWBODBZU submitted 2023-11-09 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

Don't Waste a Single Annotation: Improving Single-Label Classifiers Through Soft Labels

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG
keywords labelsoftlabelstrainingannotationannotatorclassifiersdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we address the limitations of the common data annotation and training methods for objective single-label classification tasks. Typically, when annotating such tasks annotators are only asked to provide a single label for each sample and annotator disagreement is discarded when a final hard label is decided through majority voting. We challenge this traditional approach, acknowledging that determining the appropriate label can be difficult due to the ambiguity and lack of context in the data samples. Rather than discarding the information from such ambiguous annotations, our soft label method makes use of them for training. Our findings indicate that additional annotator information, such as confidence, secondary label and disagreement, can be used to effectively generate soft labels. Training classifiers with these soft labels then leads to improved performance and calibration on the hard label test set.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. From Ground Truth to Measurement: A Statistical Framework for Human Labeling

    stat.ME 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A statistical framework decomposes human annotation outcomes into four interpretable variation sources and extends classical measurement-error models to handle both shared and individualized notions of truth.