pith. sign in

arxiv: 2311.16823 · v1 · pith:GOYIBZWInew · submitted 2023-11-28 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech · cond-mat.mes-hall· physics.app-ph· physics.chem-ph

Engineering Ratchet-Based Particle Separation via Shortcuts to Isothermality

Xiu-Hua Zhao , Z. C. Tu , Yu-Han Ma This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 06:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.app-phphysics.chem-ph
keywords particle separationratchet potentialshortcuts to isothermalityBrownian motionnon-equilibrium thermodynamicsthermodynamic lengthoverdamped dynamics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Shortcuts to isothermality in a periodic ratchet separate overdamped particles by diffusion coefficient.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a non-equilibrium thermodynamic method for separating Brownian particles that uses shortcuts to isothermality to drive a ratchet potential with finite period tau. In the slow-driving limit the resulting average velocity is proportional to (1 minus D over a chosen threshold D-star) divided by tau, which means particles whose diffusion coefficients lie above or below the threshold drift in opposite directions. The same construction yields a lower bound on the extra work cost that scales with the square of the thermodynamic length of the driving loop times the achieved velocity. This links the design of finite-time thermodynamic processes directly to controllable directed transport.

Core claim

In the slow-driving regime the average particle velocity satisfies v_s proportional to (1 minus D over D-star) times tau to the minus one, so particles with different diffusion coefficients D move in distinct directions set by a preset D-star; there also exists an extra energetic cost bounded below by W_ex to the min proportional to L squared times v_s, where L is the thermodynamic length of the driving loop.

What carries the argument

Shortcuts-to-isothermality protocol realized in a temporally periodic ratchet potential, which supplies the exact finite-time driving that produces the leading 1/tau velocity term.

If this is right

  • Particles with D greater than D-star and D less than D-star are transported in opposite directions under the same driving protocol.
  • The minimal extra work cost scales with the square of the thermodynamic length of the driving loop times the resulting velocity.
  • Minimizing the thermodynamic length of the loop yields the optimal separation protocol for given velocity.
  • The sawtooth ratchet numerically confirms both the velocity formula and the work bound.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same protocol structure could be tested in underdamped or active-particle ratchets to check whether the velocity sign remains controlled by D minus D-star.
  • The work bound implies a thermodynamic speed limit for any ratchet separation scheme that follows a closed loop in parameter space.
  • One could ask whether an analogous construction works when the diffusion coefficient itself is position-dependent.

Load-bearing premise

The shortcuts-to-isothermality driving can be realized exactly inside the chosen ratchet and the large-tau expansion fixes the sign of velocity without higher-order corrections reversing it.

What would settle it

Measure the long-time average velocity for two particle species whose diffusion coefficients straddle the preset D-star; if the species with larger D does not travel opposite to the species with smaller D at leading order in 1/tau, the separation claim is false.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2311.16823 by Xiu-Hua Zhao, Yu-Han Ma, Z. C. Tu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Schematic diagram of ratchet-based particle sep [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) One period of the original periodic potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) The time-ensemble-averaged velocity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Microscopic particle separation plays vital role in various scientific and industrial domains. In this Letter, we propose a universal non-equilibrium thermodynamic approach, employing the concept of Shortcuts to Isothermality, to realize controllable separation of overdamped Brownian particles. By utilizing a designed ratchet potential with temporal period $\tau$, we find in the slow-driving regime that the average particle velocity $\Bar{v}_s\propto\left(1-D/D^*\right)\tau^{-1}$, indicating that particles with different diffusion coefficients $D$ can be guided to move in distinct directions with a preset $D^*$. Furthermore, we reveal that there exists an extra energetic cost with a lower bound $W_{\rm{ex}}^{(\rm{min})}\propto\mathcal{L}^{2}\Bar{v}_s$, alongside a quasi-static work consumption. Here, $\mathcal{L}$ is the thermodynamic length of the driving loop in the parametric space. We numerically validate our theoretical findings and illustrate the optimal separation protocol (associated with $W_{\rm{ex}}^{(\rm{min})}$) with a sawtooth potential. This study establishes a bridge between thermodynamic process engineering and particle separation, paving the way for further explorations of thermodynamic constrains and optimal control in ratchet-based particle separation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a non-equilibrium thermodynamic protocol based on shortcuts to isothermality (STI) applied to a temporally periodic ratchet potential to separate overdamped Brownian particles by diffusion coefficient. In the slow-driving (large-τ) regime the authors derive that the average velocity satisfies v̄_s ∝ (1 − D/D*) τ^{-1}, so that particles with D < D* and D > D* drift in opposite directions for a preset threshold D*; they further obtain a lower bound on the excess work W_ex^(min) ∝ ℒ² v̄_s, where ℒ is the thermodynamic length of the driving loop. The claims are illustrated and numerically checked for a sawtooth potential.

Significance. If the velocity scaling and work bound are rigorously established, the work supplies a thermodynamically controlled, directionally tunable separation mechanism whose energetic overhead is bounded by a geometric quantity (thermodynamic length). The combination of an exact STI construction with a ratchet geometry and the explicit scaling relation would constitute a concrete advance at the interface of stochastic thermodynamics and ratchet-based transport.

major comments (2)
  1. [slow-driving regime analysis (abstract and main derivation)] The headline proportionality v̄_s ∝ (1 − D/D*) τ^{-1} is stated in the abstract and used to claim directional control, yet the manuscript provides neither the explicit steps of the slow-driving expansion of the probability current nor an explicit demonstration that the O(τ^{-2}) and higher corrections remain sub-dominant and do not reverse sign for the finite τ values employed in the numerics. Without this check, the claimed sign flip at D = D* remains unverified.
  2. [STI protocol construction] Realizability of the exact STI protocol inside the chosen asymmetric ratchet is load-bearing for the instantaneous-equilibrium assumption that underlies the velocity formula; the manuscript does not supply the explicit control protocol (time-dependent force or potential schedule) that enforces the designed equilibrium distribution at every instant for the sawtooth potential.
minor comments (2)
  1. [abstract and equations] Notation: the over-bar on v_s is used inconsistently with standard ensemble-average notation; a clearer symbol or explicit definition would improve readability.
  2. [numerical results] The numerical section reports validation but does not tabulate the measured v_s τ values versus τ or versus D/D* to allow direct inspection of the predicted linear scaling and zero-crossing.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. The two major comments identify points where additional explicit derivations and protocol details will improve clarity and verifiability. We will revise the manuscript to address both.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [slow-driving regime analysis (abstract and main derivation)] The headline proportionality v̄_s ∝ (1 − D/D*) τ^{-1} is stated in the abstract and used to claim directional control, yet the manuscript provides neither the explicit steps of the slow-driving expansion of the probability current nor an explicit demonstration that the O(τ^{-2}) and higher corrections remain sub-dominant and do not reverse sign for the finite τ values employed in the numerics. Without this check, the claimed sign flip at D = D* remains unverified.

    Authors: We agree that the slow-driving expansion requires a more explicit presentation. In the revised manuscript we will insert a dedicated subsection (or appendix) that carries out the perturbative expansion of the Fokker-Planck probability current for the time-periodic ratchet, retaining terms through O(τ^{-1}) and showing that the leading contribution yields v̄_s ∝ (1 − D/D*) τ^{-1}. We will also add a supplementary numerical check, for the precise τ values used in the main-text figures, confirming that the O(τ^{-2}) and higher corrections remain smaller than the leading term and preserve the velocity sign change at D = D*. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [STI protocol construction] Realizability of the exact STI protocol inside the chosen asymmetric ratchet is load-bearing for the instantaneous-equilibrium assumption that underlies the velocity formula; the manuscript does not supply the explicit control protocol (time-dependent force or potential schedule) that enforces the designed equilibrium distribution at every instant for the sawtooth potential.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the explicit time-dependent schedule realizing the STI protocol for the sawtooth ratchet was not provided. In the revision we will add an appendix (or supplementary section) that gives the closed-form expression for the required time-dependent force F(x,t) (or equivalently the potential V(x,t)) that enforces the instantaneous equilibrium distribution at every instant, together with a brief verification that this schedule is compatible with the periodic boundary conditions of the ratchet. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: velocity scaling and work bound derived independently from STI protocol and slow-driving expansion

full rationale

The claimed result v_s ∝ (1 - D/D*) τ^{-1} follows from applying the shortcuts-to-isothermality driving protocol to the Fokker-Planck equation for the ratchet and truncating the large-τ expansion at leading order; D* enters as an externally chosen preset that sets the zero-velocity threshold, not as a fitted parameter or self-referential quantity. The bound W_ex^(min) ∝ L² v_s is obtained from the standard thermodynamic length definition applied to the driving loop. No self-definitional, fitted-input-renamed-as-prediction, or self-citation-load-bearing steps appear in the derivation chain. The protocol realizability and truncation assumptions are stated explicitly as modeling choices rather than tautologies. The paper is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the overdamped Langevin description of Brownian motion, the realizability of shortcuts to isothermality for the chosen driving protocol, and the validity of the leading-order slow-driving expansion; no new particles or forces are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • D*
    Chosen threshold diffusion coefficient that sets the separation direction; not fitted to data but preset by the experimenter.
  • tau
    Temporal period of the ratchet driving; treated as a controllable parameter in the slow-driving limit.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Overdamped Langevin dynamics governs the particle motion
    Standard modeling choice for microscopic particles in viscous fluid at the scales considered.
  • domain assumption Shortcuts to isothermality can be implemented exactly via the designed time-dependent ratchet
    Core methodological premise imported from prior non-equilibrium thermodynamics literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5764 in / 1465 out tokens · 31298 ms · 2026-05-24T06:02:58.538710+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Harnisch and U

    F. Harnisch and U. Schr¨ oder, Selectivity versus mobility: Separation of anode and cathode in microbial bioelectro- chemical systems, ChemSusChem 2, 921 (2009)

    work page 2009

  2. [2]

    F. Xie, T. A. Zhang, D. Dreisinger, and F. Doyle, A critical review on solvent extraction of rare earths from aqueous solutions, Minerals Engineering 56, 10 (2014)

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    D. S. Sholl and R. P. Lively, Seven chemical separations to change the world, Nature 532, 435 (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Makanyire, S

    T. Makanyire, S. Sanchez-Segado, and A. Jha, Separation and recovery of critical metal ions using ionic liquids, Advances in Manufacturing 4, 33 (2016)

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    S. Yang, F. Zhang, H. Ding, P. He, and H. Zhou, Lithium metal extraction from seawater, Joule 2, 1648 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Nouri and W

    R. Nouri and W. Guan, Nanofluidic charged-coupled de- vices for controlled DNA transport and separation, Nan- otechnology 32, 345501 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    T. Mei, H. Zhang, and K. Xiao, Bioinspired artificial ion pumps, ACS Nano 16, 13323 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Zamboulis, E

    D. Zamboulis, E. N. Peleka, N. K. Lazaridis, and K. A. Matis, Metal ion separation and recovery from environ- mental sources using various flotation and sorption tech- niques, Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology 86, 335 (2011)

    work page 2011

  9. [9]

    Reguera, A

    D. Reguera, A. Luque, P. S. Burada, G. Schmid, J. M. Rub ´ ı, and P. H¨ anggi, Entropic splitter for particle sepa- ration, Physical Review Letters 108, 020604 (2012)

    work page 2012

  10. [10]

    Zhang, K

    X. Zhang, K. Zuo, X. Zhang, C. Zhang, and P. Liang, Selective ion separation by capacitive deionization (CDI) based technologies: a state-of-the-art review, Environ- mental Science: Water Research & Technology 6, 243 (2020)

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    H. Yoon, J. Lee, S. Kim, and J. Yoon, Review of con- cepts and applications of electrochemical ion separation (EIONS) process, Separation and Purification Technol- ogy 215, 190 (2019)

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    S/suppress lapik, J

    A. S/suppress lapik, J. /suppress Luczka, P. H¨ anggi, and J. Spiechowicz, Tun- able mass separation via negative mobility, Physical Re- view Letters 122, 070602 (2019)

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    Marbach and L

    S. Marbach and L. Bocquet, Active sieving across driven nanopores for tunable selectivity, The Journal of Chem- ical Physics 147, 154701 (2017)

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    H. B. Park, J. Kamcev, L. M. Robeson, M. Elimelech, and B. D. Freeman, Maximizing the right stuff: The trade-off between membrane permeability and selectiv- ity, Science 356, eaab0530 (2017)

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    P. S. Goh, W. J. Lau, M. H. D. Othman, and A. F. Is- mail, Membrane fouling in desalination and its mitigation strategies, Desalination 425, 130 (2018)

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    Tang and M

    C. Tang and M. L. Bruening, Ion separations with mem- branes, Journal of Polymer Science 58, 2831 (2020)

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    Epsztein, R

    R. Epsztein, R. M. DuChanois, C. L. Ritt, A. Noy, and M. Elimelech, Towards single-species selectivity of mem- branes with subnanometre pores, Nature Nanotechnol- ogy 15, 426 (2020)

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    Rousselet, L

    J. Rousselet, L. Salome, A. Ajdari, and J. Prostt, Direc- tional motion of brownian particles induced by a periodic asymmetric potential, Nature 370, 446 (1994)

    work page 1994

  19. [19]

    L. P. Faucheux and A. Libchaber, Selection of brown- ian particles, Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions 91, 3163 (1995)

    work page 1995

  20. [20]

    J. S. Bader, R. W. Hammond, S. A. Henck, M. W. Deem, G. A. McDermott, J. M. Bustillo, J. W. Simpson, G. T. Mulhern, and J. M. Rothberg, DNA transport by a mi- cromachined brownian ratchet device, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96, 13165 (1999)

    work page 1999

  21. [21]

    Matthias and F

    S. Matthias and F. M¨ uller, Asymmetric pores in a silicon 6 membrane acting as massively parallel brownian ratchets, Nature 424, 53 (2003)

    work page 2003

  22. [22]

    C. R. Doering, Randomly rattled ratchets, Il Nuovo Ci- mento D 17, 685 (1995)

    work page 1995

  23. [23]

    J. M. R. Parrondo, J. M. Blanco, F. J. Cao, and R. Brito, Efficiency of brownian motors, Europhysics Letters 43, 248 (1998)

    work page 1998

  24. [24]

    Reimann, Brownian motors: noisy transport far from equilibrium, Physics Reports 361, 57 (2002)

    P. Reimann, Brownian motors: noisy transport far from equilibrium, Physics Reports 361, 57 (2002)

    work page 2002

  25. [25]

    Parrondo and B

    J. Parrondo and B. de Cisneros, Energetics of brownian motors: a review, Applied Physics A 75, 179 (2002)

    work page 2002

  26. [26]

    Lau and O

    B. Lau and O. Kedem, Electron ratchets: State of the field and future challenges, The Journal of Chemical Physics 152, 200901 (2020)

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    Nicollier, C

    P. Nicollier, C. Schwemmer, F. Ruggeri, D. Widmer, X. Ma, and A. W. Knoll, Nanometer-scale-resolution multichannel separation of spherical particles in a rocking ratchet with increasing barrier heights, Physical Review Applied 15, 034006 (2021)

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    Herman, J

    A. Herman, J. W. Ager, S. Ardo, and G. Segev, Ratchet- based ion pumps for selective ion separations, PRX En- ergy 2, 023001 (2023)

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    V. M. Rozenbaum, High-temperature brownian motors: Deterministic and stochastic fluctuations of a periodic potential, JETP Letters 88, 342 (2008)

    work page 2008

  30. [30]

    W. Chr. Germs, E. M. Roeling, L. J. van IJzendoorn, R. A. J. Janssen, and M. Kemerink, Diffusion enhance- ment in on/off ratchets, Applied Physics Letters 102, 073104 (2013)

    work page 2013

  31. [31]

    Kedem, B

    O. Kedem, B. Lau, and E. A. Weiss, How to drive a flash- ing electron ratchet to maximize current, Nano Letters 17, 5848 (2017)

    work page 2017

  32. [32]

    Kanada, R

    R. Kanada, R. Shinagawa, and K. Sasaki, Diffusion en- hancement of brownian motors revealed by a solvable model, Physical Review E 98, 062110 (2018)

    work page 2018

  33. [33]

    A. G. Fane, R. Schofield, and C. J. D. Fell, The efficient use of energy in membrane distillation, Desalination 64, 231 (1987)

    work page 1987

  34. [34]

    A. M. Tsirlin, V. Kazakov, and D. V. Zubov, Finite-time thermodynamics: Limiting possibilities of irreversible separation processes, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 106, 10926 (2002)

    work page 2002

  35. [35]

    Huang, R

    Y. Huang, R. W. Baker, and L. M. Vane, Low-energy distillation-membrane separation process, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 49, 3760 (2010)

    work page 2010

  36. [36]

    Chen, R.-X

    J.-F. Chen, R.-X. Zhai, C. Sun, and H. Dong, Geodesic lower bound of the energy consumption to achieve mem- brane separation within finite time, PRX Energy 2, 033003 (2023)

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    Gu´ ery-Odelin, A

    D. Gu´ ery-Odelin, A. Ruschhaupt, A. Kiely, E. Tor- rontegui, S. Mart ´ ınez-Garaot, and J. Muga, Shortcuts to adiabaticity: Concepts, methods, and applications, Re- views of Modern Physics 91, 045001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  38. [38]

    Nakamura, J

    K. Nakamura, J. Matrasulov, and Y. Izumida, Fast- forward approach to stochastic heat engine, Physical Re- view E 102, 012129 (2020)

    work page 2020

  39. [39]

    Gu´ ery-Odelin, C

    D. Gu´ ery-Odelin, C. Jarzynski, C. A. Plata, A. Prados, and E. Trizac, Driving rapidly while remaining in control: classical shortcuts from hamiltonian to stochastic dynam- ics, Reports on Progress in Physics 86, 035902 (2023)

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    G. Li, H. T. Quan, and Z. C. Tu, Shortcuts to isothermal- ity and nonequilibrium work relations, Physical Review E 96, 012144 (2017)

    work page 2017

  41. [42]

    Li and Z

    G. Li and Z. C. Tu, Nonequilibrium work relations meet engineered thermodynamic control: A perspective for nonequilibrium measurements, Europhysics Letters 142, 61001 (2023)

    work page 2023

  42. [43]

    I) and energetics (Sec

    See supplemental materials for analytical derivations re- garding framework (Sec. I) and energetics (Sec. II). The simulation details are given in Sec. III

    work page

  43. [44]

    L. E. Reichl, A modern course in statistical physics (John Wiley & Sons, 2016)

    work page 2016

  44. [45]

    Cavina, A

    V. Cavina, A. Mari, and V. Giovannetti, Slow dynamics and thermodynamics of open quantum systems, Physical review letters 119, 050601 (2017)

    work page 2017

  45. [46]

    Ma, J.-F

    Y.-H. Ma, J.-F. Chen, C. Sun, and H. Dong, Minimal en- ergy cost to initialize a bit with tolerable error, Physical Review E 106, 034112 (2022)

    work page 2022

  46. [47]

    E. A. Mun, C. Hannell, S. E. Rogers, P. Hole, A. C. Williams, and V. V. Khutoryanskiy, On the role of spe- cific interactions in the diffusion of nanoparticles in aque- ous polymer solutions, Langmuir 30, 308 (2014)

    work page 2014

  47. [48]

    T. C. Chan, H. T. Li, and K. Y. Li, Effects of shapes of solute molecules on diffusion: A study of dependences on solute size, solvent, and temperature, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 119, 15718 (2015)

    work page 2015

  48. [49]

    Iwahashi and Y

    M. Iwahashi and Y. Kasahara, Effects of molecular size and structure on self-diffusion coefficient and viscosity for saturated hydrocarbons having six carbon atoms, Journal of Oleo Science 56, 443 (2007)

    work page 2007

  49. [50]

    T. R. Marrero and E. A. Mason, Gaseous diffusion coeffi- cients, Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data 1, 3 (2009)

    work page 2009

  50. [52]

    Seifert, Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation the- orems and molecular machines, Reports on Progress in Physics 75, 126001 (2012)

    U. Seifert, Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation the- orems and molecular machines, Reports on Progress in Physics 75, 126001 (2012)

    work page 2012

  51. [54]

    G. E. Crooks, Measuring thermodynamic length, Physi- cal Review Letters 99, 100602 (2007)

    work page 2007

  52. [55]

    D. A. Sivak and G. E. Crooks, Thermodynamic metrics and optimal paths, Physical review letters 108, 190602 (2012)

    work page 2012

  53. [56]

    Zwanzig, Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics (Ox- ford University Press, 2001)

    R. Zwanzig, Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics (Ox- ford University Press, 2001)

    work page 2001

  54. [57]

    In fact, only a free parameter exsits in this protocol, since a1 +a2 +a3 = 1 and 2a2 + 3a3 = 0 are imposed to ensure the continuity of f (s) and its first derivative along the driving loop

    work page

  55. [58]

    There may exist different trajectories leading to the same particle flux but have different energy cost

    The presented optimal path associated with the mini- mumWex on a given trajectory in the parametric space. There may exist different trajectories leading to the same particle flux but have different energy cost. Determining the optimal trajectory and the corresponding driving pro- tocol is an open question for achieving globally optimal control in both ge...

    work page

  56. [59]

    I. A. Mart ´ ınez,´E. Rold´ an, L. Dinis, D. Petrov, J. M. Par- rondo, and R. A. Rica, Brownian carnot engine, Nature physics 12, 67 (2016)

    work page 2016

  57. [60]

    Ma, R.-X

    Y.-H. Ma, R.-X. Zhai, J. Chen, C. Sun, and H. Dong, Experimental test of the 1/ τ-scaling entropy generation in finite-time thermodynamics, Physical Review Letters 125, 210601 (2020). 7

    work page 2020

  58. [61]

    Yuan, Y.-H

    H. Yuan, Y.-H. Ma, and C. P. Sun, Optimizing thermo- dynamic cycles with two finite-sized reservoirs, Physical Review E 105, L022101 (2022)

    work page 2022

  59. [62]

    Y.-H. Ma, D. Xu, H. Dong, and C.-P. Sun, Optimal op- erating protocol to achieve efficiency at maximum power of heat engines, Physical Review E 98, 022133 (2018)

    work page 2018

  60. [63]

    A. G. Frim and M. R. DeWeese, Geometric bound on the efficiency of irreversible thermodynamic cycles, Physical Review Letters 128, 230601 (2022)

    work page 2022

  61. [64]

    Zhao, Z.-N

    X.-H. Zhao, Z.-N. Gong, and Z. Tu, Low-dissipation en- gines: Microscopic construction via shortcuts to adia- baticity and isothermality, the optimal relation between power and efficiency, Physical Review E 106, 064117 (2022)

    work page 2022

  62. [65]

    Rolandi, P

    A. Rolandi, P. Abiuso, and M. Perarnau-Llobet, Collec- tive advantages in finite-time thermodynamics, Physical Review Letters 131, 210401 (2023)

    work page 2023

  63. [66]

    Marcos, H. C. Fu, T. R. Powers, and R. Stocker, Separa- tion of microscale chiral objects by shear flow, Physical Review Letters 102, 158103 (2009)

    work page 2009

  64. [67]

    Bechinger, R

    C. Bechinger, R. Di Leonardo, H. Lowen, C. Reichhardt, G. Volpe, and G. Volpe, Active particles in complex and crowded environments, Reviews of Modern Physics 88, 045006 (2016)

    work page 2016

  65. [68]

    Xu, T.-C

    G.-h. Xu, T.-C. Li, and B.-q. Ai, Sorting of chiral active particles by a spiral shaped obstacle, Physica A: Statisti- cal Mechanics and its Applications 608, 128247 (2022)

    work page 2022

  66. [69]

    Khatri and P

    N. Khatri and P. S. Burada, Mass separation in an asym- metric channel, Physical Review E 104, 044109 (2021)

    work page 2021

  67. [70]

    Khatri and R

    N. Khatri and R. Kapral, Inertial effects on rectification and diffusion of active brownian particles in an asym- metric channel, The Journal of Chemical Physics 158, 124903 (2023)

    work page 2023

  68. [71]

    Gupta and P

    A. Gupta and P. S. Burada, Separation of interacting ac- tive particles in an asymmetric channel, Physical Review E 108, 034605 (2023)

    work page 2023

  69. [72]

    J. A. C. Albay, S. R. Wulaningrum, C. Kwon, P.-Y. Lai, and Y. Jun, Thermodynamic cost of a shortcuts- to-isothermal transport of a brownian particle, Physical Review Research 1, 033122 (2019)

    work page 2019

  70. [73]

    Engineering Ratchet-Based Particle Separation via Shortcuts to Isothermality

    J. A. C. Albay, P.-Y. Lai, and Y. Jun, Realization of finite-rate isothermal compression and expansion us- ing optical feedback trap, Applied Physics Letters 116, 103706 (2020). Supplemental Materials for: “Engineering Ratchet-Based Particle Separation via Shortcuts to Isothermality” Xiu-Hua Zhao, 1 Z. C. Tu, 1, 2 and Yu-Han Ma 1, 3,∗ 1Department of Physi...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  71. [74]

    G. Li, H. T. Quan, and Z. C. Tu, Shortcuts to isothermality and nonequilibrium work relations, Physical Review E 96, 012144 (2017)

    work page 2017

  72. [75]

    Li, J.-F

    G. Li, J.-F. Chen, C. Sun, and H. Dong, Geodesic path for the minimal energy cost in shortcuts to isothermality, Physical Review Letters 128, 230603 (2022)

    work page 2022

  73. [76]

    Salamon and R

    P. Salamon and R. S. Berry, Thermodynamic length and dissipated availability, Physical Review Letters 51, 1127 (1983)

    work page 1983

  74. [77]

    G. E. Crooks, Measuring thermodynamic length, Physical Review Letters 99, 100602 (2007)

    work page 2007

  75. [78]

    A. C. Bra´ nka and D. M. Heyes, Algorithms for brownian dynamics simulation, Physical Review E 58, 2611 (1998)

    work page 1998

  76. [79]

    Sekimoto, Stochastic Energetics (Springer, 2010)

    K. Sekimoto, Stochastic Energetics (Springer, 2010)

    work page 2010