Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

PromptBench: A Unified Library for Evaluation of Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.07910 v3 pith:54726C2Y submitted 2023-12-13 cs.AI cs.CLcs.LG

PromptBench: A Unified Library for Evaluation of Large Language Models

classification cs.AI cs.CLcs.LG
keywords evaluationpromptbenchpromptlanguagelargelibraryllmsmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The evaluation of large language models (LLMs) is crucial to assess their performance and mitigate potential security risks. In this paper, we introduce PromptBench, a unified library to evaluate LLMs. It consists of several key components that are easily used and extended by researchers: prompt construction, prompt engineering, dataset and model loading, adversarial prompt attack, dynamic evaluation protocols, and analysis tools. PromptBench is designed to be an open, general, and flexible codebase for research purposes that can facilitate original study in creating new benchmarks, deploying downstream applications, and designing new evaluation protocols. The code is available at: https://github.com/microsoft/promptbench and will be continuously supported.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Measuring Behavior Portability in Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A new framework measures behavioral portability of LLMs across payoff-equivalent environments and reports substantial systematic transfer losses in seven economic decision problems.

  2. Simplicity Paradox: Debunking myths about prompting and datasets for LLM evaluation

    cs.CL 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    In a 430k-evaluation study, plain baseline prompting beats most elaborate prompting techniques on non-reasoning LLMs across MCQA benchmarks, with only small role-framing variants gaining about 3 percentage points.

  3. Safe-Child-LLM: A Developmental Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Safety in Child-LLM Interactions

    cs.CY 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Safe-Child-LLM supplies a new developmental benchmark dataset and evaluation protocol that exposes safety gaps in leading LLMs when handling child and adolescent users.

  4. JailbreakBench: An Open Robustness Benchmark for Jailbreaking Large Language Models

    cs.CR 2024-03 accept novelty 6.0

    JailbreakBench supplies an evolving set of jailbreak prompts, a 100-behavior dataset aligned with usage policies, a standardized evaluation framework, and a leaderboard to enable comparable assessments of attacks and ...