Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

LLbezpeky: Leveraging Large Language Models for Vulnerability Detection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.01269 v2 pith:JVXZ76DO submitted 2024-01-02 cs.CR cs.AIcs.SE

classification cs.CRcs.AIcs.SE
keywords detectionbuildingexperimentsllmsvulnerabilitiesvulnerabilityanalysisandroid
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite the continued research and progress in building secure systems, Android applications continue to be ridden with vulnerabilities, necessitating effective detection methods. Current strategies involving static and dynamic analysis tools come with limitations like overwhelming number of false positives and limited scope of analysis which make either difficult to adopt. Over the past years, machine learning based approaches have been extensively explored for vulnerability detection, but its real-world applicability is constrained by data requirements and feature engineering challenges. Large Language Models (LLMs), with their vast parameters, have shown tremendous potential in understanding semnatics in human as well as programming languages. We dive into the efficacy of LLMs for detecting vulnerabilities in the context of Android security. We focus on building an AI-driven workflow to assist developers in identifying and rectifying vulnerabilities. Our experiments show that LLMs outperform our expectations in finding issues within applications correctly flagging insecure apps in 91.67% of cases in the Ghera benchmark. We use inferences from our experiments towards building a robust and actionable vulnerability detection system and demonstrate its effectiveness. Our experiments also shed light on how different various simple configurations can affect the True Positive (TP) and False Positive (FP) rates.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 11 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. LLMs in Software Security: A Survey of Vulnerability Detection Techniques and Insights

    cs.CR 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey of LLM-based vulnerability detection covering 58 papers, with a taxonomy, dataset overview, and gap analysis, but limited by non-transparent selection and unsupported quantitative claims.

Pith tools