Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

SoK: Systematization and Benchmarking of Deepfake Detectors in a Unified Framework

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.04364 v4 pith:6FFTUPCK submitted 2024-01-09 cs.CV cs.CRcs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.CRcs.LG
keywords detectorsdeepfakedeepfakescriteriadevelopmentframeworkgeneralizabilitythem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deepfakes have rapidly emerged as a serious threat to society due to their ease of creation and dissemination, triggering the accelerated development of detection technologies. However, many existing detectors rely on labgenerated datasets for validation, which may not prepare them for novel, real-world deepfakes. This paper extensively reviews and analyzes state-of-the-art deepfake detectors, evaluating them against several critical criteria. These criteria categorize detectors into 4 high-level groups and 13 finegrained sub-groups, aligned with a unified conceptual framework we propose. This classification offers practical insights into the factors affecting detector efficacy. We evaluate the generalizability of 16 leading detectors across comprehensive attack scenarios, including black-box, white-box, and graybox settings. Our systematized analysis and experiments provide a deeper understanding of deepfake detectors and their generalizability, paving the way for future research and the development of more proactive defenses against deepfakes.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. From Prediction to Explanation: Multimodal, Explainable, and Interactive Deepfake Detection Framework for Non-Expert Users

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A pipeline combining a deepfake classifier, Grad-CAM heatmaps, image captioning, and an LLM generates layered explanations of deepfake verdicts for non-expert users.

  2. Visual Language Models as Zero-Shot Deepfake Detectors

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Zero-shot VLMs scored by normalized yes/no token probabilities beat most trained deepfake detectors on a new SimSwap dataset, and a lightly fine-tuned InstructBLIP is near-perfect on DFDC-P.

  3. Unmasking Synthetic Realities in Generative AI: A Comprehensive Review of Adversarially Robust Deepfake Detection Systems

    cs.CR 2025-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A systematic review of deepfake detection finds a pervasive lack of adversarial robustness evaluation across all modalities and calls for resilient, modality-agnostic detectors.

Pith tools