Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Fixed-Budget Differentially Private Best Arm Identification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.09073 v1 pith:5K4UQRFB submitted 2024-01-17 cs.LG cs.AIcs.ITmath.ITmath.STstat.MLstat.TH

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.ITmath.ITmath.STstat.MLstat.TH
keywords varepsilonprivacyconstrainterrorfixed-budgetconstraintslowerprobability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

We study best arm identification (BAI) in linear bandits in the fixed-budget regime under differential privacy constraints, when the arm rewards are supported on the unit interval. Given a finite budget $T$ and a privacy parameter $\varepsilon>0$, the goal is to minimise the error probability in finding the arm with the largest mean after $T$ sampling rounds, subject to the constraint that the policy of the decision maker satisfies a certain {\em $\varepsilon$-differential privacy} ($\varepsilon$-DP) constraint. We construct a policy satisfying the $\varepsilon$-DP constraint (called {\sc DP-BAI}) by proposing the principle of {\em maximum absolute determinants}, and derive an upper bound on its error probability. Furthermore, we derive a minimax lower bound on the error probability, and demonstrate that the lower and the upper bounds decay exponentially in $T$, with exponents in the two bounds matching order-wise in (a) the sub-optimality gaps of the arms, (b) $\varepsilon$, and (c) the problem complexity that is expressible as the sum of two terms, one characterising the complexity of standard fixed-budget BAI (without privacy constraints), and the other accounting for the $\varepsilon$-DP constraint. Additionally, we present some auxiliary results that contribute to the derivation of the lower bound on the error probability. These results, we posit, may be of independent interest and could prove instrumental in proving lower bounds on error probabilities in several other bandit problems. Whereas prior works provide results for BAI in the fixed-budget regime without privacy constraints or in the fixed-confidence regime with privacy constraints, our work fills the gap in the literature by providing the results for BAI in the fixed-budget regime under the $\varepsilon$-DP constraint.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Blind Targeting: Personalization under Third-Party Privacy Constraints

    stat.ME 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A Bayesian-optimization-based 'strategic querying' method recovers nearly all non-privacy-preserving targeting value from limited, noisy aggregate queries in simulations and on Criteo data.

  2. Optimal Regret of Bernoulli Bandits under Global Differential Privacy

    stat.ML 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    For epsilon-global-DP Bernoulli bandits, the paper proves a tighter lower bound and matching upper bounds (up to a factor alpha that can approach 1) using a new quantity d_epsilon and a new DP-Chernoff concentration i...

Pith tools