REVIEW 4 cited by
Safe Offline Reinforcement Learning with Feasibility-Guided Diffusion Model
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Safe Offline Reinforcement Learning with Feasibility-Guided Diffusion Model
read the original abstract
Safe offline RL is a promising way to bypass risky online interactions towards safe policy learning. Most existing methods only enforce soft constraints, i.e., constraining safety violations in expectation below thresholds predetermined. This can lead to potentially unsafe outcomes, thus unacceptable in safety-critical scenarios. An alternative is to enforce the hard constraint of zero violation. However, this can be challenging in offline setting, as it needs to strike the right balance among three highly intricate and correlated aspects: safety constraint satisfaction, reward maximization, and behavior regularization imposed by offline datasets. Interestingly, we discover that via reachability analysis of safe-control theory, the hard safety constraint can be equivalently translated to identifying the largest feasible region given the offline dataset. This seamlessly converts the original trilogy problem to a feasibility-dependent objective, i.e., maximizing reward value within the feasible region while minimizing safety risks in the infeasible region. Inspired by these, we propose FISOR (FeasIbility-guided Safe Offline RL), which allows safety constraint adherence, reward maximization, and offline policy learning to be realized via three decoupled processes, while offering strong safety performance and stability. In FISOR, the optimal policy for the translated optimization problem can be derived in a special form of weighted behavior cloning. Thus, we propose a novel energy-guided diffusion model that does not require training a complicated time-dependent classifier to extract the policy, greatly simplifying the training. We compare FISOR against baselines on DSRL benchmark for safe offline RL. Evaluation results show that FISOR is the only method that can guarantee safety satisfaction in all tasks, while achieving top returns in most tasks.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Decoupled Guidance Diffusion for Adaptive Offline Safe Reinforcement Learning
SDGD uses cost-conditioned classifier-free guidance plus reward guidance with feasible trajectory relabeling to generate safe high-reward trajectories that adapt to changing safety budgets in offline RL.
-
Advantage-Guided Diffusion for Model-Based Reinforcement Learning
Advantage-guided diffusion (SAG and EAG) steers sampling in diffusion world models to higher-advantage trajectories, enabling policy improvement and better sample efficiency on MuJoCo tasks.
-
Neuro-Symbolic Injection of LTLf Constraints in Autoregressive Reinforcement Learning Policies
A neuro-symbolic framework compiles LTLf formulas to DFAs, derives differentiable satisfaction signals from DFA progression, and uses them as a logic-based regularization loss to enforce temporal constraints in autore...
-
How Does the Lagrangian Guide Safe Reinforcement Learning through Diffusion Models?
ALGD augments the Lagrangian to locally convexify the energy landscape in diffusion models, stabilizing safe RL training and generation without changing optimal policies.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.