arxiv: 2602.02924 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-02 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.SY· eess.SY

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

How Does the Lagrangian Guide Safe Reinforcement Learning through Diffusion Models?

Xiaoyuan Cheng , Wenxuan Yuan , Boyang Li , Yuanchao Xu , Yiming Yang , Hao Liang , Bei Peng , Robert Loftin

show 2 more authors

Zhuo Sun Yukun Hu

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 07:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.SYeess.SY

keywords safe reinforcement learningdiffusion modelsaugmented Lagrangianoff-policy RLenergy-based modelsprimal-dual optimizationpolicy sampling

0 comments

The pith

Augmented Lagrangian stabilizes diffusion-based safe reinforcement learning by convexifying its energy landscape.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes Augmented Lagrangian-Guided Diffusion (ALGD) for off-policy safe RL with diffusion policies that support multimodal actions. It shows that standard primal-dual methods produce a non-convex Lagrangian landscape, which acts as an energy function and destabilizes the denoising dynamics during policy sampling and training. By introducing an augmented Lagrangian, ALGD locally convexifies this landscape. The result is stabilized generation and training that leaves the optimal policy distribution unchanged. Experiments across environments confirm the approach delivers stable performance.

Core claim

The instability of primal-dual methods in diffusion-based safe RL arises from the non-convex Lagrangian landscape, which serves as an energy function for the denoising dynamics. Introducing an augmented Lagrangian locally convexifies this energy landscape, stabilizing both policy generation and training without altering the distribution of the optimal policy.

What carries the argument

The augmented Lagrangian that locally convexifies the energy landscape guiding the diffusion denoising dynamics in safe RL.

If this is right

Stabilized policy generation during diffusion sampling.
Stabilized training process for the diffusion-based policy.
Preservation of the distribution of the optimal policy.
Improved empirical performance across diverse safe RL environments.
Theoretical grounding via optimization theory and energy-based models.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The stabilization technique may transfer to other generative models that rely on energy-guided sampling under constraints.
Real-world robotics tasks needing multimodal actions could gain from safer online adaptation without retraining from scratch.
Varying the strength of the augmentation term might reveal trade-offs between stability and sample efficiency in high-dimensional problems.

Load-bearing premise

The augmented Lagrangian locally convexifies the energy landscape for diffusion denoising dynamics without introducing bias or altering the optimal policy distribution.

What would settle it

An experiment that applies the augmented Lagrangian and still records unstable sampling trajectories or a measurable shift away from the original optimal policy distribution.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.02924 by Bei Peng, Boyang Li, Hao Liang, Robert Loftin, Wenxuan Yuan, Xiaoyuan Cheng, Yiming Yang, Yuanchao Xu, Yukun Hu, Zhuo Sun.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Visualization of energy landscapes for a differential-drive mobile robot (Contreras et al., 2017) after 100 training episodes based on our methods (see the two algorithms implementation in Appendix E). Top: The landscape of standard Lagrangian induces a highly irregular and non-convex energy surface with sharp curvature, reflecting unstable denoising dynamics. Bottom: The landscape of augmented Lagrangian… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Comparative analysis of training stability between the standard Lagrangian (yellow) and the augmented Lagrangian (blue). (Top) Evaluation rewards; (Middle) Dual variable λ updates; (Bottom) Average constraint violation (calculated as max(0, c(s)−h)). The augmented formulation directly addresses the oscillation of dual variables (L2) and the instability of the induced Boltzmann distribution (L3) by regulari… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Comparison of performance across Safety-Gym and MuJoCo benchmarks. For each benchmark, the first row reports the evolution of test reward versus environment steps, the second row shows the corresponding test safety cost (with the dashed line indicating the cost budget), and the third row presents box plots of the training cost distribution over four equal step intervals. Overall, ALGD achieves competitive … view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Ablation Studies of Monte Carlo sample size N. Due to the space limitation, see full results in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Task environments used in our experiments. Top row: Safe-Gym manipulation and navigation tasks, including Point Button, Car Button, and Point Push, which require the agent to accomplish goal-oriented behaviors while satisfying safety constraints such as obstacle avoidance and region constraints. Bottom row: Velocity-constrained MuJoCo locomotion tasks, including HalfCheetah, Hopper, Ant, and Humanoid, wher… view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Comparisons with on-policy baselines on Safety-Gym (top half) and velocity-constrained MuJoCo (bottom half). In general, compared with the on-policy baselines, ALGD achieves competitive returns while demonstrating improved sample efficiency and stronger safety performance. 29 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Ablation study on Monte Carlo score estimation. We evaluate different numbers of Monte Carlo samples N ∈ {2, 4, 6, 8, 16} on PointPush1 (top row) and PointButton2 (bottom row). From left to right, we report the test reward, test cost, and training cost over the course of training. As N increases, the learned policies consistently achieve higher test reward and lower test cost, while also exhibiting reduced… view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Ablation Studies of critic ensemble size M. We study the effect of varying the critic ensemble size M ∈ {1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 16} on PointPush1 (top row) and PointButton2 (bottom row). From left to right, the plots show test reward, test cost, and training cost throughout training. Increasing M consistently improves performance, yielding higher test rewards and lower test costs, while also reducing training cost… view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Effect of the convexification strength ρ in the augmented Lagrangian. We report test reward (left), test cost (middle), and training cost statistics (right) on the PointButton1 task for different values of ρ. A moderate convexification strength leads to stable denoising dynamics, consistent cost satisfaction, and strong reward performance. When ρ is too small, the augmented Lagrangian provides insufficient… view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Full comparative analysis of training stability between the standard Lagrangian (yellow) and the augmented Lagrangian (blue). (Top) Evaluation rewards; (Middle) Dual variable λ updates; (Bottom) Average constraint violation (calculated as max(0, c(s) − h)). The augmented formulation directly addresses the oscillation of dual variables (L2) and the instability of the induced Boltzmann distribution (L3) by … view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Diffusion policy sampling enables reinforcement learning (RL) to represent multimodal action distributions beyond suboptimal unimodal Gaussian policies. However, existing diffusion-based RL methods primarily focus on offline settings for reward maximization, with limited consideration of safety in online settings. To address this gap, we propose Augmented Lagrangian-Guided Diffusion (ALGD), a novel algorithm for off-policy safe RL. By revisiting optimization theory and energy-based model, we show that the instability of primal-dual methods arises from the non-convex Lagrangian landscape. In diffusion-based safe RL, the Lagrangian can be interpreted as an energy function guiding the denoising dynamics. Counterintuitively, direct usage destabilizes both policy generation and training. ALGD resolves this issue by introducing an augmented Lagrangian that locally convexifies the energy landscape, yielding a stabilized policy generation and training process without altering the distribution of the optimal policy. Theoretical analysis and extensive experiments demonstrate that ALGD is both theoretically grounded and empirically effective, achieving strong and stable performance across diverse environments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

ALGD tries to fix online instability in diffusion-based safe RL by augmenting the Lagrangian to locally convexify the energy landscape, but the no-bias claim on the optimal policy distribution needs direct verification against finite-rho effects.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that this paper introduces ALGD to handle instability when using Lagrangian guidance inside diffusion policies for safe online RL. They reinterpret the Lagrangian as an energy function for the denoising process, note that its non-convexity causes problems in primal-dual updates, and add an augmentation term that they say convexifies the landscape locally while leaving the optimal policy distribution unchanged. That specific move, applied to off-policy safe RL, is the new piece relative to prior offline diffusion RL work. The abstract links it back to optimization theory and energy-based models, which gives the idea a coherent starting point, and the claimed experiments across environments suggest it delivers stable performance where direct Lagrangian guidance does not. That practical angle is worth noting if the baselines and environments are standard. The soft spot is the central theoretical assertion. Standard augmented-Lagrangian analysis shows that finite rho generally moves the minimizer, so the generated diffusion distribution would be the minimizer of the modified energy rather than the original constrained problem. The abstract states the augmentation does not alter the optimal policy distribution, but without seeing the derivation or how they control the bias in the SDE, that step remains the part most open to question. The augmentation parameter is also free, which raises the usual issue of how it is set in practice. This work is aimed at people already working on constrained RL who want to move beyond Gaussian policies to diffusion ones. It has a concrete problem and a targeted fix, so it deserves a serious referee even if the theory section will likely need more detail and the experiments more ablation on the rho choice.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes Augmented Lagrangian-Guided Diffusion (ALGD) for off-policy safe reinforcement learning. It reinterprets the Lagrangian as an energy function guiding diffusion denoising dynamics, identifies instability in primal-dual methods as arising from non-convexity, and introduces an augmented Lagrangian that locally convexifies the landscape. The central claim is that this yields stabilized policy generation and training without altering the distribution of the optimal policy. Theoretical analysis and experiments are presented to support effectiveness across environments.

Significance. If the claim that finite augmentation preserves the exact optimal policy distribution while providing local convexity for the denoising SDE holds, the work would meaningfully advance safe RL by enabling stable online use of multimodal diffusion policies. It would bridge constrained optimization with energy-based diffusion guidance in a way that addresses a recognized instability source.

major comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract and theoretical analysis section: the assertion that the augmented Lagrangian stabilizes the process 'without altering the distribution of the optimal policy' is load-bearing for the central contribution. Standard augmented-Lagrangian theory establishes that L(x,λ,ρ)=f(x)+λᵀg(x)+(ρ/2)‖g(x)‖² shares stationary points with the original problem only in the limit ρ→∞; for any finite ρ the minimizer generally shifts. The manuscript must provide an explicit derivation or proof showing that the argmin of the finite-ρ energy function driving the diffusion denoising SDE remains identical to that of the unaugmented Lagrangian, or state the precise conditions under which this invariance holds.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract refers to 'theoretical analysis' and 'extensive experiments' without indicating the specific environments, metrics, or baseline comparisons; the main text should make these details immediately visible in the introduction or results overview.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive comment on the invariance claim. The point is well-taken and we address it directly below with a clarification of stationary points versus global minimizers, an explicit derivation under our assumptions, and a commitment to expand the theoretical section.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and theoretical analysis section: the assertion that the augmented Lagrangian stabilizes the process 'without altering the distribution of the optimal policy' is load-bearing for the central contribution. Standard augmented-Lagrangian theory establishes that L(x,λ,ρ)=f(x)+λᵀg(x)+(ρ/2)‖g(x)‖² shares stationary points with the original problem only in the limit ρ→∞; for any finite ρ the minimizer generally shifts. The manuscript must provide an explicit derivation or proof showing that the argmin of the finite-ρ energy function driving the diffusion denoising SDE remains identical to that of the unaugmented Lagrangian, or state the precise conditions under which this invariance holds.

Authors: We agree that a rigorous justification is required and thank the referee for identifying this gap. First, we note that stationary points are in fact shared for any finite ρ (not only in the limit): at any feasible point where g(x)=0 and ∇f + λᵀ∇g = 0, the extra term ρ g ∇g vanishes, so ∇L_aug = ∇L_original. The referee's statement on stationary points therefore does not hold in general. For the global argmin, we provide the following derivation in the revised manuscript. Let E(π) = L(π,λ) be the original Lagrangian energy and E_aug(π) = L(π,λ) + (ρ/2)‖g(π)‖² the augmented energy. Let π* be the unique global minimizer of the original constrained problem, so g(π*)=0 and E(π*) ≤ E(π) for all π. For any infeasible π with g(π)≠0, E_aug(π) = E(π) + (ρ/2)‖g(π)‖² > E(π) ≥ E(π*). Hence E_aug(π*) < E_aug(π) for all π≠π*, establishing that π* remains the unique global minimizer of E_aug for any ρ>0. The diffusion denoising SDE is driven by the gradient of this energy; because the mode is unchanged, the sampled policy distribution at convergence is identical. We will insert this derivation (with the uniqueness assumption stated explicitly) into the theoretical analysis section and update the abstract to reference the precise condition (unique feasible optimum). revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation chain is self-contained; no reductions to inputs by construction

full rationale

The paper derives the ALGD method by interpreting the Lagrangian as an energy function for diffusion denoising and then introducing an augmented Lagrangian to locally convexify the landscape. This step is presented as following from standard optimization theory and energy-based models rather than from any self-definition, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or self-citation chain. The claim that the augmentation leaves the optimal policy distribution unchanged is asserted as a theoretical consequence without reducing to a tautology or data-tuned fit inside the paper; the augmentation parameter is introduced as part of the algorithm definition. No load-bearing step collapses to its own inputs, and the central result remains independent of the present paper's fitted values or prior self-citations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The approach rests on standard optimization theory for primal-dual instability and the energy-based interpretation of diffusion dynamics; the augmentation is the main addition.

free parameters (1)

augmentation parameter
Introduced to achieve local convexity; no specific value or selection method given in abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Lagrangian can be interpreted as an energy function guiding denoising dynamics in diffusion models
Invoked when connecting optimization to diffusion policy sampling.
domain assumption Instability of primal-dual methods arises from non-convex Lagrangian landscape
Stated as the root cause of instability in existing methods.

invented entities (1)

Augmented Lagrangian for diffusion guidance no independent evidence
purpose: To locally convexify the energy landscape for stable policy generation and training
New construct proposed to resolve the identified instability while preserving optimality.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5502 in / 1370 out tokens · 35715 ms · 2026-05-16T07:52:57.991714+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

ALGD resolves this issue by introducing an augmented Lagrangian that locally convexifies the energy landscape, yielding a stabilized policy generation and training process without altering the distribution of the optimal policy. ... LA(s, a, λ) := -Qπ(s, a) + ([λ + ρ(Qπc(s, a) - h)]²+ - λ²)/(2ρ)
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlphaCoordinateFixation.lean costAlphaLog_fourth_deriv_at_zero unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

∇²a LA(s, a, λ) = ∇²a L(s, a, λ) + ρ ∇a Qπc ∇a Qπc^T + O(|Qπc - h|)

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages · 7 internal anchors

[1]

J., Mittal, S., Lemos, P., Liu, C.-H., Sendera, M., Ravanbakhsh, S., Gidel, G., Bengio, Y ., et al

Akhound-Sadegh, T., Rector-Brooks, J., Bose, A. J., Mittal, S., Lemos, P., Liu, C.-H., Sendera, M., Ravanbakhsh, S., Gidel, G., Bengio, Y ., et al. Iterated denoising energy matching for sampling from boltzmann densities.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.06121,

work page arXiv
[2]

R., Ying, L., and Izzo, Z

Chen, H., Ren, Y ., Min, M. R., Ying, L., and Izzo, Z. Solving inverse problems via diffusion-based priors: An approximation-free ensemble sampling approach.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.03979,

work page arXiv
[3]

Safe and stable control via lyapunov-guided diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.25375,

Cheng, X., Tang, X., and Yang, Y . Safe and stable control via lyapunov-guided diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.25375,

work page arXiv
[4]

J., Strong, C

Choi, J. J., Strong, C. A., Sreenath, K., Cho, N., and Tom- lin, C. J. Data-driven hamiltonian for direct construc- tion of safe set from trajectory data.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.03233,

work page arXiv
[5]

Dong, X., Cheng, J., and Zhang, X. S. Maximum entropy re- inforcement learning with diffusion policy.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.11612,

work page arXiv
[6]

DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning

Guo, D., Yang, D., Zhang, H., Song, J., Zhang, R., Xu, R., Zhu, Q., Ma, S., Wang, P., Bi, X., et al. Deepseek-r1: In- centivizing reasoning capability in llms via reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.12948,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[7]

Planning with Diffusion for Flexible Behavior Synthesis

Janner, M., Du, Y ., Tenenbaum, J. B., and Levine, S. Plan- ning with diffusion for flexible behavior synthesis.arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.09991,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[8]

Model-based constrained reinforcement learning using generalized control barrier function

Ma, H., Chen, J., Eben, S., Lin, Z., Guan, Y ., Ren, Y ., and Zheng, S. Model-based constrained reinforcement learning using generalized control barrier function. In 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 4552–4559. IEEE,

work page 2021
[9]

Efficient online reinforcement learning for diffusion policy.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.00361,

Ma, H., Chen, T., Wang, K., Li, N., and Dai, B. Efficient online reinforcement learning for diffusion policy.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.00361,

work page arXiv
[10]

Flow q-learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.02538,

Park, S., Li, Q., and Levine, S. Flow q-learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.02538,

work page arXiv
[11]

Psenka, A

Psenka, M., Escontrela, A., Abbeel, P., and Ma, Y . Learn- ing a diffusion model policy from rewards via q-score matching.arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11752,

work page arXiv
[12]

Sablas: Learning safe control for black-box dynamical systems.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 7(2):1928–1935,

Qin, Z., Sun, D., and Fan, C. Sablas: Learning safe control for black-box dynamical systems.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 7(2):1928–1935,

work page 1928
[13]

Diffusion Policy Policy Optimization

Ren, A. Z., Lidard, J., Ankile, L. L., Simeonov, A., Agrawal, P., Majumdar, A., Burchfiel, B., Dai, H., and Simchowitz, M. Diffusion policy policy optimization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.00588,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[14]

and H¨utter, J.-C

Rigollet, P. and H¨utter, J.-C. High-dimensional statistics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.19244,

work page arXiv
[15]

and Fan, C

So, O. and Fan, C. Solving stabilize-avoid optimal control via epigraph form and deep reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.14154,

work page arXiv
[16]

Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations

Song, Y ., Sohl-Dickstein, J., Kingma, D. P., Kumar, A., Er- mon, S., and Poole, B. Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equations.arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.13456,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[17]

Tassa, Y ., Doron, Y ., Muldal, A., Erez, T., Li, Y ., Casas, D. d. L., Budden, D., Abdolmaleki, A., Merel, J., Lefrancq, A., et al. Deepmind control suite.arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.00690,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[18]

Reward Constrained Policy Optimization

Tessler, C., Mankowitz, D. J., and Mannor, S. Re- ward constrained policy optimization.arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.11074,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[19]

and Schwartz, A

Thrun, S. and Schwartz, A. Issues in using function approx- imation for reinforcement learning. InProceedings of the 1993 connectionist models summer school, pp. 255–263. Psychology Press,

work page 1993
[20]

Un- derstanding reinforcement learning-based fine-tuning of diffusion models: A tutorial and review.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.13734,

Uehara, M., Zhao, Y ., Biancalani, T., and Levine, S. Un- derstanding reinforcement learning-based fine-tuning of diffusion models: A tutorial and review.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.13734,

work page arXiv
[21]

Diffusion Policies as an Expressive Policy Class for Offline Reinforcement Learning

Wang, Z., Hunt, J. J., and Zhou, M. Diffusion policies as an expressive policy class for offline reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.06193,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[22]

Off-policy primal-dual safe reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.14758,

Wu, Z., Tang, B., Lin, Q., Yu, C., Mao, S., Xie, Q., Wang, X., and Wang, D. Off-policy primal-dual safe reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.14758,

work page arXiv
[23]

Constrained diffusers for safe planning and control

Zhang, J., Zhao, L., Papachristodoulou, A., and Umenberger, J. Constrained diffusers for safe planning and control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.12544, 2025a. Zhang, S. and Fan, C. Learning to stabilize high- dimensional unknown systems using lyapunov-guided exploration. In6th Annual Learning for Dynamics & Control Conference, pp. 52–67. PMLR,

work page arXiv
[24]

Discrete gcbf proximal policy optimization for multi-agent safe optimal control.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.03640, 2025b

Zhang, S., So, O., Black, M., and Fan, C. Discrete gcbf proximal policy optimization for multi-agent safe optimal control.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.03640, 2025b. Zhang, S., So, O., Black, M., Serlin, Z., and Fan, C. Solving multi-agent safe optimal control with distributed epigraph form marl.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.15425, 2025c. Zhang, Y ., Vuong, Q., a...

work page arXiv
[25]

E., Zhan, X., and Liu, J

Zheng, Y ., Li, J., Yu, D., Yang, Y ., Li, S. E., Zhan, X., and Liu, J. Safe offline reinforcement learning with feasibility-guided diffusion model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.10700,

work page arXiv
[26]

dual variable) τdiffusion step 12 Augmented Lagrangian-Guided Diffusion Appendix Overview This appendix is organized into four main parts

11 Augmented Lagrangian-Guided Diffusion Notation Notations Meaning aaction a0|τ the posterior distributionp(a 0|aτ , s) csafety cost d0 initial distribution of state hsafety threshold rreward function sstate ttime step Aaction set Bτ standard Brownian motions Breplay buffer DKL KL divergence of two distributions LLagrangian LA augmented Lagrangian NGauss...

work page 2019
[27]

However, these approaches are largely restricted to the offline setting

have revealed fundamental connections between diffusion-based generative modeling and diffusion policies (Janner et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2022; Ren et al., 2024; Chi et al., 2025). However, these approaches are largely restricted to the offline setting. More recently, researchers have begun to explore diffusion policies in online RL settings, enabling c...

work page 2022
[28]

Despite recent progress, most existing diffusion-based approaches remain confined to the offline reinforcement learning setting

treats the reverse diffusion process as a direct policy function and employs a Gaussian-mixture entropy regulator to adaptively balance exploration and exploitation. Despite recent progress, most existing diffusion-based approaches remain confined to the offline reinforcement learning setting. Recent studies have further explored safe offline policy gener...

work page 2023
[29]

In the following proposition, we present a method for estimating the exact score function for Lagrangian-guided diffusion under the VE SDE framework

Then, we have logπ ∗(a|s)∝ − L(s, a, λ) +η β , which yields the Boltzmann-form solution π∗(a|s) = exp − L(s,a,λ) β Z(s) , Z(s) = Z a exp − L(s, a, λ) β da, (18) indicating that the optimal policy follows a Boltzmann distribution, where fluctuations in the Lagrange multiplier λ directly reshape the policy landscape. In the following proposition, we present...

work page 2023
[30]

Proof of Proposition 3.1.According to the definition of the VE SDE (Chen et al., 2025), the intermediate distribution πτ(aτ |s)is generated as πτ(aτ |s) = Z π0(a0|s)N aτ;a 0, σ2(τ)I da0 = π0(a0|s)∗ N(0, σ 2(τ)I) (aτ), which follows directly from the forward diffusion as a Gaussian smoothing ofπ 0(a|s). 16 Augmented Lagrangian-Guided Diffusion Differentiat...

work page 2025
[31]

Z K 0 q dσ2(τ) dτ −1 × dσ2(τ) dτ ˜ϕA(s, aτ , τ)−ϕ ∗(s, aτ , τ) 2 dτ # = 1 2 Eπ0(a0|s)

= 1 2 Ep2 "Z T 0 ∥σ−1(b2(xτ)−b 1(xτ))∥2 dτ # , which establishes the result. Proof.Returning to our setting, we adopt asame-path constructionfor the reverse-time diffusion process. Specifically, we consider a single stochastic trajectory aτ ∈C([0, K];R d) defined on a common filtered probability space and driven by the same Brownian motion Bτ . Different ...

work page 2017
[32]

To rule out potential confounding effects, we evaluated the use of cost critic ensembles in the baseline methods, including SAC+Lag and CAL (originally proposed with ensembles)

Notably, our algorithm already exhibits stable learning and safe policy behavior even without the ensemble ( M= 1 ); increasing the ensemble size does not alter the underlying energy landscape, but instead strengthens the approach by allowing ¯Qc to provide a more accurate estimate of∇aLA(s, a, λ), thereby improving gradient quality and overall algorithm ...

work page 2000