Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Personalized Differential Privacy for Ridge Regression

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.17127 v1 pith:WN5PMDCR submitted 2024-01-30 cs.LG cs.CRcs.CY

Personalized Differential Privacy for Ridge Regression

classification cs.LG cs.CRcs.CY
keywords privacydatapdp-opaccuracypersonalizedpointdifferentdifferential
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The increased application of machine learning (ML) in sensitive domains requires protecting the training data through privacy frameworks, such as differential privacy (DP). DP requires to specify a uniform privacy level $\varepsilon$ that expresses the maximum privacy loss that each data point in the entire dataset is willing to tolerate. Yet, in practice, different data points often have different privacy requirements. Having to set one uniform privacy level is usually too restrictive, often forcing a learner to guarantee the stringent privacy requirement, at a large cost to accuracy. To overcome this limitation, we introduce our novel Personalized-DP Output Perturbation method (PDP-OP) that enables to train Ridge regression models with individual per data point privacy levels. We provide rigorous privacy proofs for our PDP-OP as well as accuracy guarantees for the resulting model. This work is the first to provide such theoretical accuracy guarantees when it comes to personalized DP in machine learning, whereas previous work only provided empirical evaluations. We empirically evaluate PDP-OP on synthetic and real datasets and with diverse privacy distributions. We show that by enabling each data point to specify their own privacy requirement, we can significantly improve the privacy-accuracy trade-offs in DP. We also show that PDP-OP outperforms the personalized privacy techniques of Jorgensen et al. (2015).

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Mechanism Design for Privacy-Preserving Information Sharing in Oligopoly Competition

    econ.TH 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    In Cournot oligopoly, privacy noise plus external platform signals expands the region where firms share demand information; the platform picks the least noise that implements full sharing.

  2. Mechanism Design for Privacy-Preserving Information Sharing in Oligopoly Competition

    econ.TH 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    In a Cournot oligopoly with uncertain demand, voluntary information sharing via privacy-preserving aggregation arises in n-firm markets even without privacy but requires a sufficiently informative external signal in g...