Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

A Survey for Foundation Models in Autonomous Driving

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.01105 v4 pith:TTGJSZRL submitted 2024-02-02 cs.LG cs.CVcs.RO

A Survey for Foundation Models in Autonomous Driving

classification cs.LG cs.CVcs.RO
keywords modelsfoundationdrivingresearchsurveyautonomousgapslanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The advent of foundation models has revolutionized the fields of natural language processing and computer vision, paving the way for their application in autonomous driving (AD). This survey presents a comprehensive review of more than 40 research papers, demonstrating the role of foundation models in enhancing AD. Large language models contribute to planning and simulation in AD, particularly through their proficiency in reasoning, code generation and translation. In parallel, vision foundation models are increasingly adapted for critical tasks such as 3D object detection and tracking, as well as creating realistic driving scenarios for simulation and testing. Multi-modal foundation models, integrating diverse inputs, exhibit exceptional visual understanding and spatial reasoning, crucial for end-to-end AD. This survey not only provides a structured taxonomy, categorizing foundation models based on their modalities and functionalities within the AD domain but also delves into the methods employed in current research. It identifies the gaps between existing foundation models and cutting-edge AD approaches, thereby charting future research directions and proposing a roadmap for bridging these gaps.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. MME-RealWorld: Could Your Multimodal LLM Challenge High-Resolution Real-World Scenarios that are Difficult for Humans?

    cs.CV 2024-08 conditional novelty 8.0

    MME-RealWorld is the largest manually annotated high-resolution benchmark for MLLMs, where even the best models achieve less than 60% accuracy on challenging real-world tasks.

  2. SCP: Spatial Causal Prediction in Video

    cs.CV 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    SCP defines a new benchmark task for predicting spatial causal outcomes beyond direct observation and shows that 23 leading models lag far behind humans on it.

  3. SoccerMaster: A Vision Foundation Model for Soccer Understanding

    cs.CV 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    SoccerMaster is the first soccer-specific vision foundation model that unifies tasks from player detection to event classification via multi-task pretraining and outperforms task-specific models on downstream evaluations.

  4. Unveiling Transferability in Trajectory Prediction via Latent Scene Embeddings

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Framework learns latent scene embeddings from 24 trajectory datasets to produce transferability scores that correlate with cross-dataset model performance.