Pith. sign in

REVIEW 16 cited by

ODIN: Disentangled Reward Mitigates Hacking in RLHF

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.07319 v1 pith:YXEY3DTO submitted 2024-02-11 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL
keywords lengthrewardevaluationtraininghackingllmsresponsehuman
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this work, we study the issue of reward hacking on the response length, a challenge emerging in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) on LLMs. A well-formatted, verbose but less helpful response from the LLMs can often deceive LLMs or even human evaluators to achieve high scores. The same issue also holds for some reward models in RL. To address the challenges in both training and evaluation, we establish a more reliable evaluation protocol for comparing different training configurations, which inspects the trade-off between LLM evaluation score and response length obtained by varying training hyperparameters. Based on this evaluation, we conduct large-scale studies, where the results shed insights into the efficacy of hyperparameters and tricks used in RL on mitigating length bias. We further propose to improve the reward model by jointly training two linear heads on shared feature representations to predict the rewards, one trained to correlate with length, and the other trained to decorrelate with length and therefore focus more on the actual content. We then discard the length head in RL to prevent reward hacking on length. Experiments demonstrate that our approach almost eliminates the reward correlation with length, and improves the obtained policy by a significant margin.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 16 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. AutoRubric-T2I: Robust Rule-Based Reward Model for Text-to-Image Alignment

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    AutoRubric-T2I learns a small set of interpretable rubrics for VLM judges that outperform scalar reward models on T2I benchmarks while using far less preference data.

  2. AutoRubric-T2I: Robust Rule-Based Reward Model for Text-to-Image Alignment

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    AutoRubric-T2I learns and selects explicit rubrics from preference pairs to guide VLM judges, producing high-quality interpretable rewards for T2I alignment with far less data than traditional Bradley-Terry models.

  3. Multi-Turn On-Policy Distillation with Prefix Replay

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ReOPD offline-distills multi-turn agentic LLMs via teacher-prefix replay plus step-decay sampling, matching online OPD accuracy at ≥4× speed with zero tool calls.

  4. General Preference Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    GPRL carries a k-dimensional skew-symmetric preference structure into policy updates with per-dimension advantages and a drift monitor, yielding 56.51% length-controlled win rate on AlpacaEval 2.0 from Llama-3-8B-Inst...

  5. General Preference Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    GPRL applies a k-dimensional preference model with per-dimension normalized advantages and a drift monitor to LLM post-training, reporting 56.51% length-controlled win rate on AlpacaEval 2.0 and gains on other benchma...

  6. General Preference Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    GPRL carries k-dimensional skew-symmetric preference structure into policy updates via per-dimension advantages and context-dependent eigenvalues, yielding 56.51% length-controlled win rate on AlpacaEval 2.0 from Llam...

  7. RVPO: Risk-Sensitive Alignment via Variance Regularization

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    RVPO penalizes variance across multiple reward signals during RLHF advantage aggregation, using a LogSumExp operator as a smooth variance penalty to reduce constraint neglect in LLM alignment.

  8. Factored Causal Representation Learning for Robust Reward Modeling in RLHF

    cs.LG 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    A factored causal representation learning method improves robustness of reward models in RLHF by isolating causal factors from biases like length and sycophancy using adversarial gradient reversal.

  9. Rubrics as Rewards: Reinforcement Learning Beyond Verifiable Domains

    cs.LG 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    RaR uses aggregated rubric feedback as rewards in on-policy RL, delivering up to 31% relative gains on HealthBench and 7% on GPQA-Diamond versus direct Likert LLM-as-judge baselines.

  10. CoLD: Counterfactually-Guided Length Debiasing for Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoning

    cs.CL 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    CoLD mitigates length bias in process reward models for mathematical reasoning via counterfactual guidance, length penalties, bias estimation, and joint training, improving step selection accuracy and conciseness on M...

  11. Teach a Reward Model to Correct Itself: Reward Guided Adversarial Failure Discovery for Robust Reward Modeling

    cs.CL 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    REFORM uses reward-guided controlled decoding to generate adversarial failures and augments training data to improve reward model robustness on preference datasets.

  12. Exploring the Secondary Risks of Large Language Models

    cs.LG 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Introduces secondary risks as a new class of LLM failures from benign prompts, defines two primitives, proposes SecLens search framework, and releases SecRiskBench showing risks are widespread across 16 models.

  13. Multi-Turn On-Policy Distillation with Prefix Replay

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    By replaying teacher prefixes with a step-decay schedule, multi-turn on-policy distillation can run without live environment interaction, matching or slightly beating online OPD accuracy.

  14. Many Voices, One Reward: Multi-Role Rubric Generation for LLM Judging and Reward Modeling

    cs.LG 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    MRRG elicits evaluation criteria from multiple complementary roles to build rubrics that outperform single-role baselines for validating LLM preferences and providing rewards in RLVR.

  15. Normalized Rewards for Preference Optimization

    cs.LG 2026-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A regularization term that conserves the combined length-normalized probability of chosen and rejected responses reduces likelihood displacement in DPO/SimPO, improves AlpacaEval and benchmark outcomes, and acts prima...

  16. Proxy Reward Internalization and Mechanistic Exploitation: A Learned Precursor to Reward Hacking and Its Generalization

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Proxy RL produces a staged proxy-internalization capability that emerges before and predicts reward hacking in coding environments.

Pith tools