Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

CounterCurate: Enhancing Physical and Semantic Visio-Linguistic Compositional Reasoning via Counterfactual Examples

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.13254 v4 pith:MO7N36RQ submitted 2024-02-20 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
keywords reasoningcompositionalcountercurategenerationmodelsgroundedimagesemantic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We propose CounterCurate, a framework to comprehensively improve the visio-linguistic compositional reasoning capability for both contrastive and generative multimodal models. In particular, we identify two critical under-explored problems: the neglect of the physically grounded reasoning (counting and position understanding) and the potential of using highly capable text and image generation models for semantic counterfactual fine-tuning. Our work pioneers an approach that addresses these gaps. We first spotlight the near-chance performance of multimodal models like CLIP and LLaVA in physically grounded compositional reasoning. We then apply simple data augmentation using grounded image generation model GLIGEN to generate fine-tuning data, resulting in significant performance improvements: +33% and +37% for CLIP and LLaVA, respectively, on our newly curated Flickr30k-Positions benchmark. Moreover, we exploit the capabilities of high-performing text generation and image generation models, specifically GPT-4V and DALLE-3, to curate challenging semantic counterfactuals, thereby further enhancing compositional reasoning capabilities on benchmarks such as SugarCrepe, where CounterCurate outperforms GPT-4V. To facilitate future research, we release our code, dataset, benchmark, and checkpoints at https://countercurate.github.io.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Multimodal Reinforcement Learning with Adaptive Verifier for AI Agents

    cs.AI 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Argos is an agentic verifier that adaptively picks scoring functions to evaluate accuracy, localization, and reasoning quality, enabling stronger multimodal RL training for AI agents.

  2. A Good CREPE needs more than just Sugar: Investigating Biases in Compositional Vision-Language Benchmarks

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Blind text-only likelihood models match or exceed CLIP on many compositionality benchmarks because positives and negatives differ systematically in length, plausibility, or image style.

  3. Zooming from Context to Cue: Hierarchical Preference Optimization for Multi-Image MLLMs

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Context-to-Cue Direct Preference Optimization (CcDPO) reduces multi-image hallucinations in 7B multimodal LLMs by training on perturbed full-sequence captions and region-focused visual prompts, improving average multi...

Pith tools