REVIEW 11 cited by
Determinants of LLM-assisted Decision-Making
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Determinants of LLM-assisted Decision-Making
read the original abstract
Decision-making is a fundamental capability in everyday life. Large Language Models (LLMs) provide multifaceted support in enhancing human decision-making processes. However, understanding the influencing factors of LLM-assisted decision-making is crucial for enabling individuals to utilize LLM-provided advantages and minimize associated risks in order to make more informed and better decisions. This study presents the results of a comprehensive literature analysis, providing a structural overview and detailed analysis of determinants impacting decision-making with LLM support. In particular, we explore the effects of technological aspects of LLMs, including transparency and prompt engineering, psychological factors such as emotions and decision-making styles, as well as decision-specific determinants such as task difficulty and accountability. In addition, the impact of the determinants on the decision-making process is illustrated via multiple application scenarios. Drawing from our analysis, we develop a dependency framework that systematizes possible interactions in terms of reciprocal interdependencies between these determinants. Our research reveals that, due to the multifaceted interactions with various determinants, factors such as trust in or reliance on LLMs, the user's mental model, and the characteristics of information processing are identified as significant aspects influencing LLM-assisted decision-making processes. Our findings can be seen as crucial for improving decision quality in human-AI collaboration, empowering both users and organizations, and designing more effective LLM interfaces. Additionally, our work provides a foundation for future empirical investigations on the determinants of decision-making assisted by LLMs.
Forward citations
Cited by 11 Pith papers
-
OS-SPEAR: A Toolkit for the Safety, Performance,Efficiency, and Robustness Analysis of OS Agents
OS-SPEAR is a new evaluation toolkit that tests 22 OS agents and identifies trade-offs between efficiency and safety or robustness.
-
QMFOL: Benchmarking Large Language Model Reasoning via Quantifiable Monadic First-Order Logic Test Case Generation
QMFOL generates monadic first-order logic tasks with controllable complexity via pattern-based structures and round-trip prover verification, then evaluates six LRMs showing performance drops as logical depth and widt...
-
"So There's a Catch-22 Here": How Early Adopters Who Build Multi-Agent LLM Systems Conceptualize Transparency
Semi-structured interviews with 13 early adopters in one large tech organization identify multiple framings of transparency and synthesize them into a developer-user-governance multidimensional framework.
-
Geometry-Calibrated Conformal Abstention for Language Models
Geometry-calibrated conformal abstention lets language models abstain from uncertain queries with finite-sample guarantees on both participation rate and conditional correctness of answers.
-
Discrimination by LLMs: Cross-lingual Bias Assessment and Mitigation in Decision-Making and Summarisation
LLMs show significant demographic bias in decision-making, favoring women, younger ages, and certain minority backgrounds; summarization shows little bias, and bias patterns largely transfer from English to Dutch.
-
Efficient Federated Search for Retrieval-Augmented Generation using Lightweight Routing
RAGRoute introduces a neural router for federated RAG that dynamically selects relevant sources, reducing communication by up to 80.65% and latency by 52.50% while preserving accuracy on three benchmarks.
-
Towards Understanding Modality Interaction in Multimodal Language Models via Partial Information Decomposition
PID applied to MLLMs identifies task-specific modality interaction profiles that generalize across models, extend to tri-modal cases, and yield initial performance gains via reweighting.
-
LLMs are the Ideal Candidate for Mixed-Initiative Game Design Pillar Workflows
Large language models can meaningfully support the creation and decision-making processes for game design pillars in mixed-initiative workflows, as shown by a prototype tested in a game jam and with expert interviews.
-
User Detection and Response Patterns of Sycophantic Behavior in Conversational AI
Reddit analysis shows users detect AI sycophancy through comparisons and consistency checks, apply mitigation prompts, and sometimes seek affirmative responses for support, indicating context-aware design is better th...
-
A closer look at how large language models trust humans: patterns and biases
Across 43,200 simulations with five LLMs and five scenarios, model trust in humans aligns with human-like patterns driven by trustworthiness dimensions and is sometimes biased by age, gender, and religion.
-
Enhancing Trust in Large Language Models via Uncertainty-Calibrated Fine-Tuning
Uncertainty-aware fine-tuning with a decision-theory-based loss produces better-calibrated uncertainty estimates than standard training on free-form QA tasks.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.